The Ruins
Constantin François de Chasseboeuf Volney
To read this work in Microsoft Reader, Click Here.
![]()
To Download Microsoft Reader for free,
Click Here.
![]()
Table of Contents
INVOCATION. *
CHAPTER I. THE JOURNEY. *
CHAPTER VI. THE PRIMITIVE STATE OF MAN. *
CHAPTER XIII. WILL THE HUMAN RACE IMPROVE? *
CHAPTER XVI. A FREE AND LEGISLATIVE PEOPLE. *
CHAPTER XXI. PROBLEM OF RELIGIOUS CONTRADICTIONS. *
CHAPTER XXIII. ALL RELIGIONS HAVE THE SAME OBJECT. *
CHAPTER XXIV. SOLUTION OF THE PROBLEM OF CONTRADICTIONS. *
PHILADELPHIA TRANSLATION.
THE RUINS OF EMPIRES.
* The dragon Bell.
At these words, revolving in my mind the vicissitudes which have transmitted the
sceptre of the world to people so different in religion and manners from those
in ancient Asia to the most recent of Europe, this name of a natal land revived
in me the sentiment of my country; and turning my eyes towards France, I began
to reflect on the situation in which I had left her.*
* In the year 1782, at the close of the American war.
I recalled her fields so richly cultivated, her roads so admirably constructed,
her cities inhabited by a countless people, her fleets spread over every sea,
her ports filled with the produce of both the Indies: and then comparing the
activity of her commerce, the extent of her navigation, the magnificence of her
buildings, the arts and industry of her inhabitants, with what Egypt and Syria
had once possessed, I was gratified to find in modern Europe the departed
splendor of Asia; but the charm of my reverie was soon dissolved by a last term
of comparison. Reflecting that such had once been the activity of the places I
was then contemplating, who knows, said I, but such may one day be the
abandonment of our countries? Who knows if on the banks of the Seine, the
Thames, the Zuyder-Zee, where now, in the tumult of so many enjoyments, the
heart and the eye suffice not for the multitude of sensations,--who knows if
some traveller, like myself, shall not one day sit on their silent ruins, and
weep in solitude over the ashes of their inhabitants, and the memory of their
former greatness.
At these words, my eyes filled with tears: and covering my head with the fold of
my mantle, I sank into gloomy meditations on all human affairs. Ah! hapless man,
said I in my grief, a blind fatality sports with thy destiny!* A fatal necessity
rules with the hand of chance the lot of mortals! But no: it is the justice of
heaven fulfilling its decrees!--a God of mystery exercising his incomprehensible
judgments! Doubtless he has pronounced a secret anathema against this land:
blasting with maledictions the present, for the sins of past generations. Oh!
who shall dare to fathom the depths of the Omnipotent?
* Fatality is the universal and rooted prejudice of the East. "It was
written," is there the answer to every thing. Hence result an unconcern and
apathy, the most powerful impediments to instruction and civilization.
And sunk in profound melancholy, I remained motionless.
TO EQUAL LAW, WHICH JUDGES AND PROTECTS.
And having surrounded the pyramid and the altar with a vast amphitheatre, all
the people took their seats to hear the publication of the law. And millions of
men, raising at once their hands to heaven, took the solemn oath to live equal,
free, and just; to respect their reciprocal properties and rights; to obey the
law and its regularly chosen representatives.
A spectacle so impressive and sublime, so replete with generous emotions, moved
me to tears; and addressing myself to the Genius, I exclaimed: Let me now live,
for in future I have everything to hope.
But scarcely had the solemn voice of liberty and equality resounded through
the earth, when a movement of confusion, of astonishment, arose in different
nations. On the one hand, the people, warmed with desire, but wavering between
hope and fear, between the sentiment of right and the habit of obedience, began
to be in motion. The kings, on the other hand, suddenly awakened from the sleep
of indolence and despotism, were alarmed for the safety of their thrones; while,
on all sides, those clans of civil and religious tyrants, who deceive kings and
oppress the people, were seized with rage and consternation; and, concerting
their perfidious plans, they said: Woe to us, if this fatal cry of liberty comes
to the ears of the multitude! Woe to us, if this pernicious spirit of justice be
propagated!
And, pointing to the floating banner, they continued:
Consider what a swarm of evils are included in these three words! If all men are
equal, where is our exclusive right to honors and to power? If all men are to be
free, what becomes of our slaves, our vassals, our property? If all are equal in
the civil state, where is our prerogative of birth, of inheritance? and what
becomes of nobility? If they are all equal in the sight of God, what need of
mediators?--where is the priesthood? Let us hasten, then, to destroy a germ so
prolific, and so contagious. We must employ all our cunning against this
innovation. We must frighten the kings, that they may join us in the cause. We
must divide the people by national jealousies, and occupy them with commotions,
wars, and conquests. They must be alarmed at the power of this free nation. Let
us form a league against the common enemy, demolish that sacrilegious standard,
overturn that throne of rebellion, and stifle in its birth the flame of
revolution.
And, indeed, the civil and religious tyrants of nations formed a general
combination; and, multiplying their followers by force and seduction, they
marched in hostile array against the free nation; and, surrounding the altar and
the pyramid of natural law, they demanded with loud cries:
What is this new and heretical doctrine? what this impious altar, this
sacrilegious worship? True believers and loyal subjects! can you suppose that
truth has been first discovered to-day, and that hitherto you have been walking
in error? that those men, more fortunate than you, have the sole privilege of
wisdom? And you, rebel and misguided nation, perceive you not that your new
leaders are misleading you? that they destroy the principles of your faith, and
overturn the religion of your ancestors? Ah, tremble! lest the wrath of heaven
should kindle against you; and hasten by speedy repentance to retrieve your
error.
But, inaccessible to seduction as well as to fear, the free nation kept silence,
and rising universally in arms, assumed an imposing attitude.
And the legislator said to the chiefs of nations:
If while we walked with a bandage on our eyes the light guided our steps, why,
since we are no longer blindfold, should it fly from our search? If guides, who
teach mankind to see for themselves, mislead and deceive them, what can be
expected from those who profess to keep them in darkness?
But hark, ye leaders of nations! If you possess the truth, show it to us, and we
will receive it with gratitude, for we seek it with ardor, and have a great
interest in finding it. We are men, and liable to be deceived; but you are also
men, and equally fallible. Aid us then in this labyrinth, where the human race
has wandered for so many ages; help us to dissipate the illusion of so many
prejudices and vicious habits. Amid the shock of so many opinions which dispute
for our acceptance, assist us in discovering the proper and distinctive
character of truth. Let us this day terminate the long combat with error. Let us
establish between it and truth a solemn contest, to which we will invite the
opinions of men of all nations. Let us convoke a general assembly of the
nations. Let them be judges in their own cause; and in the debate of all
systems, let no champion, no argument, be wanting, either on the side of
prejudice or of reason; and let the sentiment of a general and common mass of
evidence give birth to a universal concord of opinions and of hearts.
At these words, a new group, formed in an instant by men from various standards,
but not distinguished by any, came forward into the circle; and one of them
spoke in the name of the whole:
"Delegates, friends of evidence and virtue! It is not surprising that the
subject in question should be enveloped in so many clouds, since, besides its
inherent difficulties, thought itself has always been encumbered with superadded
obstacles peculiar to this study, where all free enquiry and discussion have
been interdicted by the intolerance of every system. But now that our views are
permitted to expand, we will expose to open day, and submit to the judgment of
nations, that which unprejudiced minds, after long researches, have found to be
the most reasonable; and we do this, not with the pretension of imposing a new
creed, but with the hope of provoking new lights, and obtaining better
information.
"Doctors and instructors of nations! You know what thick darkness covers the
nature, the origin, the history of the dogmas which you teach. Imposed by
authority, inculcated by education, and maintained by example, they pass from
age to age, and strengthen their empire from habit and inattention. But if man,
enlightened by reflection and experience, brings to mature examination the
prejudices of his childhood, he soon discovers a multitude of incongruities and
contradictions which awaken his sagacity and excite his reasoning powers.
"At first, remarking the diversity and opposition of the creeds which divide the
nations, he takes courage to question the infallibility which each of them
claims, and arming himself with their reciprocal pretensions, he conceives that
his senses and his reason, derived immediately from God, are a law not less
holy, a guide not less sure, than the mediate and contradictory codes of the
prophets.
"If he then examines the texture of these codes themselves, he observes that
their laws, pretended to be divine, that is, immutable and eternal, have arisen
from circumstances of times, places, and persons; that they have issued one from
the other, in a kind of genealogical order, borrowing from each other
reciprocally a common and similar fund of ideas, which every lawgiver modifies
according to his fancy.
If he ascends to the source of these ideas, he finds it involved in the night of
time, in the infancy of nations, even to the origin of the world, to which they
claim alliance; and there, placed in the darkness of chaos, in the empire of
fables and traditions, they present themselves, accompanied with a state of
things so full of prodigies, that it seems to forbid all access to the judgment:
but this state itself excites a first effort of reason, which resolves the
difficulty; for if the prodigies, found in the theological systems, have really
existed--if, for instance, the metamorphoses, the apparitions, the conversations
with one or many gods, recorded in the books of the Indians, the Hebrews, the
Parses, are historical events, he must agree that nature in those times was
totally different from what it is at present; that the present race of men are
quite another species from those who then existed; and, therefore, he ought not
to trouble his head about them.
"If, on the contrary, these miraculous events have really not existed in the
physical order of things, then he readily conceives that they are creatures of
the human intellect; and this faculty being still capable of the most
fantastical combinations, explains at once the phenomenon of these monsters in
history. It only remains, then, to find how and wherefore they have been formed
in the imagination. Now, if we examine with care the subjects of these
intellectual creations, analyze the ideas which they combine and associate, and
carefully weigh all the circumstances which they allege, we shall find that this
first obscure and incredible state of things is explained by the laws of nature.
We find that these stories of a fabulous kind have a figurative sense different
from the apparent one; that these events, pretended to be marvellous, are simple
and physical facts, which, being misconceived or misrepresented, have been
disfigured by accidental causes dependent on the human mind, by the confusion of
signs employed to represent the ideas, the want of precision in words,
permanence in language, and perfection in writing; we find that these gods, for
instance, who display such singular characters in every system, are only the
physical agents of nature, the elements, the winds, the stars, and the meteors,
which have been personified by the necessary mechanism of language and of the
human understanding; that their lives, their manners, their actions, are only
their mechanical operations and connections; and that all their pretended
history is only the description of these phenomena, formed by the first
naturalists who observed them, and misconceived by the vulgar who did not
understand them, or by succeeding generations who forgot them. In a word, all
the theological dogmas on the origin of the world, the nature of God, the
revelation of his laws, the manifestation of his person, are known to be only
the recital of astronomical facts, only figurative and emblematical accounts of
the motion of the heavenly bodies. We are convinced that the very idea of a God,
that idea at present so obscure, is, in its first origin, nothing but that of
the physical powers of the universe, considered sometimes as a plurality by
reason of their agencies and phenomena, sometimes as one simple and only being
by reason of the universality of the machine and the connection of its parts; so
that the being called God has been sometimes the wind, the fire, the water, all
the elements; sometimes the sun, the stars, the planets, and their influence;
sometimes the matter of the visible world, the totality of the universe;
sometimes abstract and metaphysical qualities, such as space, duration, motion,
intelligence; and we everywhere see this conclusion, that the idea of God has
not been a miraculous revelation of invisible beings, but a natural offspring of
the human intellect--an operation of the mind, whose progress it has followed
and whose revolutions it has undergone, in all the progress that has been made
in the knowledge of the physical world and its agents.
"It is then in vain that nations attribute their religion to heavenly
inspirations; it is in vain that their dogmas pretend to a primeval state of
supernatural events: the original barbarity of the human race, attested by their
own monuments,* belies these assertions at once. But there is one constant and
indubitable fact which refutes beyond contradiction all these doubtful accounts
of past ages. From this position, that man acquires and receives no ideas but
through the medium of his senses,** it follows with certainty that every notion
which claims to itself any other origin than that of sensation and experience,
is the erroneous supposition of a posterior reasoning: now, it is sufficient to
cast an eye upon the sacred systems of the origin of the world, and of the
actions of the gods, to discover in every idea, in every word, the anticipation
of an order of things which could not exist till a long time after. Reason,
strengthened by these contradictions, rejecting everything that is not in the
order of nature, and admitting no historical facts but those founded on
probabilities, lays open its own system, and pronounces itself with assurance.
* It is the unanimous testimony of history, and even of legends, that the
first human beings were every where savages, and that it was to civilize them,
and teach them to make bread, that the Gods manifested themselves.
** The rock on which all the ancients have split, and which has occasioned
all their errors, has been their supposing the idea of God to be innate and
co-eternal with the soul; and hence all the reveries developed in Plato and
Jamblicus. See the Timoeus, the Phedon, and De Mysteriis Egyptiorum, sect. I, c.
3.
"Before one nation had received from another nation dogmas already invented;
before one generation had inherited ideas acquired by a preceding generation,
none of these complicated systems could have existed in the world. The first
men, being children of nature, anterior to all events, ignorant of all science,
were born without any idea of the dogmas arising from scholastic disputes; of
rites founded on the practice of arts not then known; of precepts framed after
the development of passions; or of laws which suppose a language, a state of
society not then in being; or of God, whose attributes all refer to physical
objects, and his actions to a despotic state of government; or of the soul, or
of any of those metaphysical beings, which we are told are not the objects of
sense, and for which, however, there can be no other means of access to the
understanding. To arrive at so many results, the necessary circle of preceding
facts must have been observed; slow experience and repeated trials must have
taught the rude man the use of his organs; the accumulated knowledge of
successive generations must have invented and improved the means of living; and
the mind, freed from the cares of the first wants of nature, must have raised
itself to the complicated art of comparing ideas, of digesting arguments, and
seizing abstract similitudes.
"It was not till after having overcome these obstacles, and gone through a long
career in the night of history, that man, reflecting on his condition, began to
perceive that he was subjected to forces superior to his own, and independent of
his will. The sun enlightened and warmed him, the fire burned him, the thunder
terrified him, the wind beat upon him, the water overwhelmed him. All beings
acted upon him powerfully and irresistibly. He sustained this action for a long
time, like a machine, without enquiring the cause; but the moment he began his
enquiries, he fell into astonishment; and, passing from the surprise of his
first reflections to the reverie of curiosity, he began a chain of reasoning.
"First, considering the action of the elements on him, he conceived an idea of
weakness and subjection on his part, and of power and domination on theirs; and
this idea of power was the primitive and fundamental type of every idea of God.
"Secondly, the action of these natural existences excited in him sensations of
pleasure or pain, of good or evil; and by a natural effect of his organization,
he conceived for them love or aversion; he desired or dreaded their presence;
and fear or hope gave rise to the first idea of religion.
"Then, judging everything by comparison, and remarking in these beings a
spontaneous movement like his own, he supposed this movement directed by a
will,--an intelligence of the nature of his own; and hence, by induction, he
formed a new reasoning. Having experienced that certain practices towards his
fellow creatures had the effect to modify their affections and direct their
conduct to his advantage, he resorted to the same practices towards these
powerful beings of the universe. He reasoned thus with himself: When my fellow
creature, stronger than I, is disposed to do me injury, I abase myself before
him, and my prayer has the art to calm him. I will pray to these powerful beings
who strike me. I will supplicate the intelligences of the winds, of the stars,
of the waters, and they will hear me. I will conjure them to avert the evil and
give me the good that is at their disposal; I will move them by my tears, I will
soften them by offerings, and I shall be happy.
"Thus simple man, in the infancy of his reason, spoke to the sun and to the
moon; he animated with his own understanding and passions the great agents of
nature; he thought by vain sounds, and vain actions, to change their inflexible
laws. Fatal error! He prayed the stone to ascend, the water to mount above its
level, the mountains to remove, and substituting a fantastical world for the
real one, he peopled it with imaginary beings, to the terror of his mind and the
torment of his race.
"In this manner the ideas of God and religion have sprung, like all others, from
physical objects; they were produced in the mind of man from his sensations,
from his wants, from the circumstances of his life, and the progressive state of
his knowledge.
"Now, as the ideas of God had their first models in physical agents, it followed
that God was at first varied and manifold, like the form under which he appeared
to act. Every being was a Power, a Genius; and the first men conceived the
universe filled with innumerable gods.
"Again the ideas of God have been created by the affections of the human heart;
they became necessarily divided into two classes, according to the sensations of
pleasure or pain, love or hatred, which they inspired.
"The forces of nature, the gods and genii, were divided into beneficent and
malignant, good and evil powers; and hence the universality of these two
characters in all the systems of religion.
"These ideas, analogous to the condition of their inventors, were for a long
time confused and ill-digested. Savage men, wandering in the woods, beset with
wants and destitute of resources, had not the leisure to combine principles and
draw conclusions; affected with more evils than they found pleasures, their most
habitual sentiment was that of fear, their theology terror; their worship was
confined to a few salutations and offerings to beings whom they conceived as
greedy and ferocious as themselves. In their state of equality and independence,
no man offered himself as mediator between men and gods as insubordinate and
poor as himself. No one having superfluities to give, there existed no parasite
by the name of priest, no tribute by the name of victim, no empire by the name
of altar. Their dogmas and their morals were the same thing, it was only
self-preservation; and religion, that arbitrary idea, without influence on the
mutual relations of men, was a vain homage rendered to the visible powers of
nature.
"Such was the necessary and original idea of God."
And the orator, addressing himself to the savage nations, continued:
"We appeal to you, men who have received no foreign and factitious ideas; tell
us, have you ever gone beyond what I have described? And you, learned doctors,
we call you to witness; is not this the unanimous testimony of all ancient
monuments?*
* It clearly results, says Plutarch, from the verses of Orpheus and the
sacred books of the Egyptians and Phrygians, that the ancient theology, not only
of the Greeks, but of all nations, was nothing more than a system of physics, a
picture of the operations of nature, wrapped up in mysterious allegories and
enigmatical symbols, in a manner that the ignorant multitude attended rather to
their apparent than to their hidden meaning, and even in what they understood of
the latter, supposed there to be something more deep than what they perceived.
Fragment of a work of Plutarch now lost, quoted by Eusebius, Proepar. Evang.
lib. 3, ch. 1, p. 83.
The majority of philosophers, says Porphyry, and among others Haeremon (who
lived in Egypt in the first age of Christianity), imagine there never to have
been any other world than the one we see, and acknowledged no other Gods of all
those recognized by the Egyptians, than such as are commonly called planets,
signs of the Zodiac, and constellations; whose aspects, that is, rising and
setting, are supposed to influence the fortunes of men; to which they add their
divisions of the signs into decans and dispensers of time, whom they style lords
of the ascendant, whose names, virtues in relieving distempers, rising, setting,
and presages of future events, are the subjects of almanacs (for be it observed,
that the Egyptian priests had almanacs the exact counterpart of Matthew
Lansberg's); for when the priests affirmed that the sun was the architect of the
universe, Chaeremon presently concludes that all their narratives respecting
Isis and Osiris, together with their other sacred fables, referred in part to
the planets, the phases of the moon, and the revolution of the sun, and in part
to the stars of the daily and nightly hemispheres and the river Nile; in a word,
in all cases to physical and natural existences and never to such as might be
immaterial and incorporeal. . . .
All these philosophers believe that the acts of our will and the motion of
our bodies depend on those of the stars to which they are subjected, and they
refer every thing to the laws of physical necessity, which they call destiny or
Fatum, supposing a chain of causes and effects which binds, by I know not what
connection, all beings together, from the meanest atom to the supremest power
and primary influence of the Gods; so that, whether in their temples or in their
idols, the only subject of worship is the power of destiny. Porphyr. Epist. ad
Janebonem.
II. Second system: Worship of the Stars, or Sabeism.
"But those same monuments present us likewise a system more methodical and more
complicated--that of the worship of all the stars; adored sometimes in their
proper forms, sometimes under figurative emblems and symbols; and this worship
was the effect of the knowledge men had acquired in physics, and was derived
immediately from the first causes of the social state; that is, from the
necessities and arts of the first degree, which are among the elements of
society.
"Indeed, as soon as men began to unite in society, it became necessary for them
to multiply the means of subsistence, and consequently to attend to agriculture:
agriculture, to be carried on with success, requires the observation and
knowledge of the heavens. It was necessary to know the periodical return of the
same operations of nature, and the same phenomena in the skies; indeed to go so
far as to ascertain the duration and succession of the seasons and the months of
the year. It was indispensable to know, in the first place, the course of the
sun, who, in his zodiacal revolution, shows himself the supreme agent of the
whole creation; then, of the moon, who, by her phases and periods, regulates and
distributes time; then, of the stars, and even of the planets, which by their
appearance and disappearance on the horizon and nocturnal hemisphere, marked the
minutest divisions. Finally, it was necessary to form a whole system of
astronomy,* or a calendar; and from these works there naturally followed a new
manner of considering these predominant and governing powers. Having observed
that the productions of the earth had a regular and constant relation with the
heavenly bodies; that the rise, growth, and decline of each plant kept pace with
the appearance, elevation, and declination of the same star or the same group of
stars; in short, that the languor or activity of vegetation seemed to depend on
celestial influences, men drew from thence an idea of action, of power, in those
beings, superior to earthly bodies; and the stars, dispensing plenty or
scarcity, became powers, genii,** gods, authors of good and evil.
* It continues to be repeated every day, on the indirect authority of the
book of Genesis, that astronomy was the invention of the children of Noah. It
has been gravely said, that while wandering shepherds in the plains of Shinar,
they employed their leisure in composing a planetary system: as if shepherds had
occasion to know more than the polar star; and if necessity was not the sole
motive of every invention! If the ancient shepherds were so studious and
sagacious, how does it happen that the modern ones are so stupid, ignorant, and
inattentive? And it is a fact that the Arabs of the desert know not so many as
six constellations, and understand not a word of astronomy.
** It appears that by the word genius, the ancients denoted a quality, a
generative power; for the following words, which are all of one family, convey
this meaning: generare, genos, genesis, genus, gens.
"As the state of society had already introduced a regular hierarchy of ranks,
employments and conditions, men, continuing to reason by comparison, carried
their new notions into their theology, and formed a complicated system of
divinities by gradation of rank, in which the sun, as first god,* was a military
chief or a political king: the moon was his wife and queen; the planets were
servants, bearers of commands, messengers; and the multitude of stars were a
nation, an army of heroes, genii, whose office was to govern the world under the
orders of their chiefs. All the individuals had names, functions, attributes,
drawn from their relations and influences; and even sexes, from the gender of
their appellations.**
* The Sabeans, ancient and modern, says Maimonides, acknowledge a principal
God, the maker and inhabitant of heaven; but on account of his great distance
they conceive him to be inaccessible; and in imitation of the conduct of people
towards their kings, they employ as mediators with him, the planets and their
angels, whom they call princes and potentates, and whom they suppose to reside
in those luminous bodies as in palaces or tabernacles, etc. More-Nebuchim.
** According as the gender of the object was in the language of the nation
masculine or feminine, the Divinity who bore its name was male or female. Thus
the Cappadocians called the moon God, and the sun Goddess: a circumstance which
gives to the same beings a perpetual variety in ancient mythology.
"And as the social state had introduced certain usages and ceremonies, religion,
keeping pace with the social state, adopted similar ones; these ceremonies, at
first simple and private, became public and solemn; the offerings became rich
and more numerous, and the rites more methodical; they assigned certain places
for the assemblies, and began to have chapels and temples; they instituted
officers to administer them, and these became priests and pontiffs: they
established liturgies, and sanctified certain days, and religion became a civil
act, a political tie.
"But in this arrangement, religion did not change its first principles; the idea
of God was always that of physical beings, operating good or evil, that is,
impressing sensations of pleasure or pain: the dogma was the knowledge of their
laws, or their manner of acting; virtue and sin, the observance or infraction of
these laws; and morality, in its native simplicity, was the judicious practice
of whatever contributes to the preservation of existence, the well-being of
one's self and his fellow creatures.*
* We may add, says Plutarch, that these Egyptian priests always regarded the
preservation of health as a point of the first importance, and as indispensably
necessary to the practice of piety and the service of the gods. See his account
of Isis and Osiris, towards the end.
"Should it be asked at what epoch this system took its birth, we shall answer on
the testimony of the monuments of astronomy itself; that its principles appear
with certainty to have been established about seventeen thousand years ago,* and
if it be asked to what people it is to be attributed, we shall answer that the
same monuments, supported by unanimous traditions, attribute it to the first
tribes of Egypt; and when reason finds in that country all the circumstances
which could lead to such a system; when it finds there a zone of sky, bordering
on the tropic, equally free from the rains of the equator and the fogs of the
North;** when it finds there a central point of the sphere of the ancients, a
salubrious climate, a great, but manageable river, a soil fertile without art or
labor, inundated without morbid exhalations, and placed between two seas which
communicate with the richest countries, it conceives that the inhabitant of the
Nile, addicted to agriculture from the nature of his soil, to geometry from the
annual necessity of measuring his lands, to commerce from the facility of
communications, to astronomy from the state of his sky, always open to
observation, must have been the first to pass from the savage to the social
state; and consequently to attain the physical and moral sciences necessary to
civilized life.
* The historical orator follows here the opinion of M. Dupuis, who, in his
learned memoirs concerning the Origin of the Constellations and Origin of all
Worship, has assigned many plausible reasons to prove that Libra was formerly
the sign of the vernal, and Aries of the autumnal equinox; that is, that since
the origin of the actual astronomical system, the precession of the equinoxes
has carried forward by seven signs the primitive order of the zodiac. Now
estimating the precession at about seventy years and a half to a degree, that
is, 2,115 years to each sign; and observing that Aries was in its fifteenth
degree, 1,447 years before Christ, it follows that the first degree of Libra
could not have coincided with the vernal equinox more lately than 15,194 years
before Christ; now, if you add 1790 years since Christ, it appears that 16,984
years have elapsed since the origin of the Zodiac. The vernal equinox coincided
with the first degree of Aries, 2,504 years before Christ, and with the first
degree of Taurus 4,619 years before Christ. Now it is to be observed, that the
worship of the Bull is the principal article in the theological creed of the
Egyptians, Persians, Japanese, etc.; from whence it clearly follows, that some
general revolution took place among these nations at that time. The chronology
of five or six thousand years in Genesis is little agreeable to this hypothesis;
but as the book of Genesis cannot claim to be considered as a history farther
back than Abraham, we are at liberty to make what arrangements we please in the
eternity that preceded. See on this subject the analysis of Genesis, in the
first volume of New Researches on Ancient History; see also Origin of
Constellatians, by Dupuis, 1781; the Origin of Worship, in 3 vols. 1794, and the
Chronological Zodiac, 1806.
** M. Balli, in placing the first astronomers at Selingenakoy, near the
Bailkal paid no attention to this twofold circumstance: it equally argues
against their being placed at Axoum on account of the rains, and the Zimb fly of
which Mr. Bruce speaks.
"It was, then, on the borders of the upper Nile, among a black race of men,
that was organized the complicated system of the worship of the stars,
considered in relation to the productions of the earth and the labors of
agriculture; and this first worship, characterized by their adoration under
their own forms and natural attributes, was a simple proceeding of the human
mind. But in a short time, the multiplicity of the objects of their relations,
and their reciprocal influence, having complicated the ideas, and the signs that
represented them, there followed a confusion as singular in its cause as
pernicious in its effects.
III. Third system. Worship of Symbols, or Idolatry.
"As soon as this agricultural people began to observe the stars with attention,
they found it necessary to individualize or group them; and to assign to each a
proper name, in order to understand each other in their designation. A great
difficulty must have presented itself in this business: First, the heavenly
bodies, similar in form, offered no distinguishing characteristics by which to
denominate them; and, secondly, the language in its infancy and poverty, had no
expressions for so many new and metaphysical ideas. Necessity, the usual
stimulus of genius, surmounted everything. Having remarked that in the annual
revolution, the renewal and periodical appearance of terrestrial productions
were constantly associated with the rising and setting of certain stars, and to
their position as relative to the sun, the fundamental term of all comparison,
the mind by a natural operation connected in thought these terrestrial and
celestial objects, which were connected in fact; and applying to them a common
sign, it gave to the stars, and their groups, the names of the terrestrial
objects to which they answered.*
* "The ancients," says Maimonides, "directing all their attention to
agriculture, gave names to the stars derived from their occupation during the
year." More Neb. pars 3.
"Thus the Ethopian of Thebes named stars of inundation, or Aquarius, those stars
under which the Nile began to overflow;* stars of the ox or the bull, those
under which they began to plow; stars of the lion, those under which that
animal, driven from the desert by thirst, appeared on the banks of the Nile;
stars of the sheaf, or of the harvest virgin, those of the reaping season; stars
of the lamb, stars of the two kids, those under which these precious animals
were brought forth: and thus was resolved the first part of the difficulty.
* This must have been June.
"Moreover, man having remarked in the beings which surrounded him certain
qualities distinctive and proper to each species, and having thence derived a
name by which to designate them, he found in the same source an ingenious mode
of generalizing his ideas; and transferring the name already invented to every
thing which bore any resemblance or analogy, he enriched his language with a
perpetual round of metaphors.
"Thus the same Ethiopian having observed that the return of the inundation
always corresponded with the rising of a beautiful star which appeared towards
the source of the Nile, and seemed to warn the husbandman against the coming
waters, he compared this action to that of the animal who, by his barking, gives
notice of danger, and he called this star the dog, the barker (Sirius). In the
same manner he named the stars of the crab, those where the sun, having arrived
at the tropic, retreated by a slow retrograde motion like the crab or cancer. He
named stars of the wild goat, or Capricorn, those where the sun, having reached
the highest point in his annuary tract, rests at the summit of the horary
gnomon, and imitates the goat, who delights to climb the summit of the rocks. He
named stars of the balance, or libra, those where the days and nights, being
equal, seemed in equilibrium, like that instrument; and stars of the scorpion,
those where certain periodical winds bring vapors, burning like the venom of the
scorpion. In the same manner he called by the name of rings and serpents the
figured traces of the orbits of the stars and the planets, and such was the
general mode of naming all the stars and even the planets, taken by groups or as
individuals, according to their relations with husbandry and terrestrial
objects, and according to the analogies which each nation found between them and
the objects of its particular soil and climate.*
* The ancients had verbs from the substantives crab, goat, tortoise, as the
French have at present the verbs serpenter, coquetter. The history of all
languages is nearly the same.
"From this it appeared that abject and terrestrial beings became associated with
the superior and powerful inhabitants of heaven; and this association became
stronger every day by the mechanism of language and the constitution of the
human mind. Men would say by a natural metaphor: The bull spreads over the earth
the germs of fecundity (in spring) he restores vegetation and plenty: the lamb
(or ram) delivers the skies from the maleficent powers of winter; he saves the
world from the serpent (emblem of the humid season) and restores the empire of
goodness (summer, joyful season): the scorpion pours out his poison on the
earth, and scatters diseases and death. The same of all similar effects.
"This language, understood by every one, was attended at first with no
inconvenience; but in the course of time, when the calendar had been regulated,
the people, who had no longer any need of observing the heavens, lost sight of
the original meaning of these expressions; and the allegories remaining in
common use became a fatal stumbling block to the understanding and to reason.
Habituated to associate to the symbols the ideas of their archetypes, the mind
at last confounded them: then the same animals, whom fancy had transported to
the skies, returned again to the earth; but being thus returned, clothed in the
livery of the stars, they claimed the stellary attributes, and imposed on their
own authors. Then it was that the people, believing that they saw their gods
among them, could pray to them with more convenience: they demanded from the ram
of their flock the influences which might be expected from the heavenly ram;
they prayed the scorpion not to pour out his venom upon nature; they revered the
crab of the sea, the scarabeus of the mud, the fish of the river; and by a
series of corrupt but inseparable analogies, they lost themselves in a labyrinth
of well connected absurdities.
"Such was the origin of that ancient whimsical worship of the animals; such is
the train of ideas by which the character of the divinity became common to the
vilest of brutes, and by which was formed that theological system, extremely
comprehensive, complicated, and learned, which, rising on the borders of the
Nile, propagated from country to country by commerce, war, and conquest,
overspread the whole of the ancient world; and which, modified by time,
circumstances and prejudices, is still seen entire among a hundred nations, and
remains as the essential and secret basis of the theology of those even who
despise and reject it."
Some murmurs at these words being heard from various groups: "Yes!" continued
the orator, "hence arose, for instance, among you, nations of Africa, the
adoration of your fetiches, plants, animals, pebbles, pieces of wood, before
which your ancestors would not have had the folly to bow, if they had not seen
in them talismans endowed with the virtue of the stars.*
* The ancient astrologers, says the most learned of the Jews (Maimonides),
having sacredly assigned to each planet a color, an animal, a tree, a metal, a
fruit, a plant, formed from them all a figure or representation of the star,
taking care to select for the purpose a proper moment, a fortunate day, such as
the conjunction of the star, or some other favorable aspect. They conceived that
by their magic ceremonies they could introduce into those figures or idols the
influences of the superior beings after which they were modeled. These were the
idols that the Chaldean-Sabeans adored; and in the performance of their worship
they were obliged to be dressed in the proper color. The astrologers, by their
practices, thus introduced idolatry, desirous of being regarded as the
dispensers of the favors of heaven; and as agriculture was the sole employment
of the ancients, they succeeded in persuading them that the rain and other
blessings of the seasons were at their disposal. Thus the whole art of
agriculture was exercised by rules of astrology, and the priests made talismans
or charms which were to drive away locusts, flies, etc. See Maimonides, More
Nebuchim, pars 3, c. 29.
The priests of Egypt, Persia, India, etc., pretended to bind the Gods to
their idols, and to make them come from heaven at their pleasure. They
threatened the sun and moon, if they were disobedient, to reveal the secret
mysteries, to shake the skies, etc., etc. Euseb. Proecep. Evang. p. 198, and
Jamblicus de Mysteriis Aegypt.
"Here, ye nations of Tartary, is the origin of your marmosets, and of all that
train of animals with which your chamans ornament their magical robes. This is
the origin of those figures of birds and of snakes which savage nations imprint
upon their skins with sacred and mysterious ceremonies.
"Ye inhabitants of India! in vain you cover yourselves with the veil of mystery:
the hawk of your god Vichenou is but one of the thousand emblems of the sun in
Egypt; and your incarnations of a god in the fish, the boar, the lion, the
tortoise, and all his monstrous adventures, are only the metamorphoses of the
sun, who, passing through the signs of the twelve animals (or the zodiac), was
supposed to assume their figures, and perform their astronomical functions.*
* These are the very words of Jamblicus de Symbolis Aegyptiorum, c. 2, sect.
7. The sun was the grand Proteus, the universal metamorphist.
"People of Japan, your bull, which breaks the mundane egg, is only the bull of
the zodiac, which in former times opened the seasons, the age of creation, the
vernal equinox. It is the same bull Apis which Egypt adored, and which your
ancestors, Jewish Rabbins, worshipped in the golden calf. This is still your
bull, followers of Zoroaster, which, sacrificed in the symbolic mysteries of
Mithra, poured out his blood which fertilized the earth. And ye Christians, your
bull of the Apocalypse, with his wings, symbol of the air, has no other origin;
and your lamb of God, sacrificed, like the bull of Mithra, for the salvation of
the world, is only the same sun, in the sign of the celestial ram, which, in a
later age, opening the equinox in his turn, was supposed to deliver the world
from evil, that is to say, from the constellation of the serpent, from that
great snake, the parent of winter, the emblem of the Ahrimanes, or Satan of the
Persians, your school masters. Yes, in vain does your imprudent zeal consign
idolaters to the torments of the Tartarus which they invented; the whole basis
of your system is only the worship of the sun, with whose attributes you have
decorated your principal personage. It is the sun which, under the name of Horus,
was born, like your God, at the winter solstice, in the arms of the celestial
virgin, and who passed a childhood of obscurity, indigence, and want, answering
to the season of cold and frost. It is he that, under the name of Osiris,
persecuted by Typhon and by the tyrants of the air, was put to death, shut up in
a dark tomb, emblem of the hemisphere of winter, and afterwards, ascending from
the inferior zone towards the zenith of heaven, arose again from the dead
triumphant over the giants and the angels of destruction.
"Ye priests! who murmur at this relation, you wear his emblems all over your
bodies; your tonsure is the disk of the sun; your stole is his zodiac;* your
rosaries are symbols of the stars and planets. Ye pontiffs and prelates! your
mitre, your crozier, your mantle are those of Osiris; and that cross whose
mystery you extol without comprehending it, is the cross of Serapis, traced by
the hands of Egyptian priests on the plan of the figurative world; which,
passing through the equinoxes and the tropics, became the emblem of the future
life and of the resurrection, because it touched the gates of ivory and of horn,
through which the soul passed to heaven."
* "The Arabs," says Herodotus, "shave their heads in a circle and about the
temples, in imitation of Bacchus (that is the sun), who shaves himself is this
manner." Jeremiah speaks also of this custom. The tuft of hair which the
Mahometans preserve, is taken also from the sun, who was painted by the
Egyptians at the winter solstice, as having but a single hair upon his head. . .
.
The robes of the goddess of Syria and of Diana of Ephesus, from whence are
borrowed the dress of the priests; have the twelve animals of the zodiac painted
on them. . . .
Rosaries are found upon all the Indian idols, constructed more than four
thousand years ago, and their use in the East has been universal from time
immemorial. . . .
The crozier is precisely the staff of Bootes or Osiris. (See plate.)
All the Lamas wear the mitre or cap in the shape of a cone, which was an
emblem of the sun.
At these words, the doctors of all the groups began to look at each other with
astonishment; but no one breaking silence, the orator proceeded:
"Three principal causes concur to produce this confusion of ideas: First, the
figurative expressions under which an infant language was obliged to describe
the relations of objects; expressions which, passing afterwards from a limited
to a general sense, and from a physical to a moral one, caused, by their
ambiguities and synonymes, a great number of mistakes.
"Thus, it being first said that the sun had surmounted, or finished, twelve
animals, it was thought afterwards that he had killed them, fought them,
conquered them; and of this was composed the historical life of Hercules.*
* See the memoir of Dupuis on the Origin of the Constellations, before cited.
"It being said that he regulated the periods of rural labor, the seed time and
the harvest, that he distributed the seasons and occupations, ran through the
climates and ruled the earth, etc., he was taken for a legislative king, a
conquering warrior; and they framed from this the history of Osiris, of Bacchus,
and others of that description.
"Having said that a planet entered into a sign, they made of this conjunction a
marriage, an adultery, an incest.* Having said that the planet was hid or
buried, when it came back to light, and ascended to its exaltation, they said
that it had died, risen again, was carried into heaven, etc.
* These are the very words of Plutarch in his account of Isis and Osiris. The
Hebrews say, in speaking of the generations of the Patriarchs, et ingressus est
in eam. From this continual equivoke of ancient language, proceeds every
mistake.
"A second cause of confusion was the material figures themselves, by which men
first painted thoughts; and which, under the name of hieroglyphics, or sacred
characters, were the first invention of the mind. Thus, to give warning of the
inundation, and of the necessity of guarding against it, they painted a boat,
the ship Argo; to express the wind, they painted the wing of a bird; to
designate the season, or the month, they painted the bird of passage, the
insect, or the animal which made its appearance at that period; to describe the
winter, they painted a hog or a serpent, which delight in humid places, and the
combination of these figures carried the known sense of words and phrases.* But
as this sense could not be fixed with precision, as the number of these figures
and their combinations became excessive, and overburdened the memory, the
immediate consequence was confusion and false interpretations. Genius afterwards
having invented the more simple art of applying signs to sounds, of which the
number is limited, and painting words, instead of thoughts, alphabetical writing
thus threw into disuetude hieroglyphical painting; and its signification,
falling daily into oblivion, gave rise to a multitude of illusions, ambiguities,
and errors.
* The reader will doubtless see with pleasure some examples of ancient
hieroglyphics.
"The Egyptians (says Hor-appolo) represent eternity by the figures of the sun
and moon. They designate the world by the blue serpent with yellow scales
(stars, it is the Chinese Dragon). If they were desirous of expressing the year,
they drew a picture of Isis, who is also in their language called Sothis, or
dog-star, one of the first constellations, by the rising of which the year
commences; its inscription at Sais was, It is I that rise in the constellation
of the Dog.
"They also represent the year by a palm tree, and the month by one of its
branches, because it is the nature of this tree to produce a branch every month.
They farther represent it by the fourth part of an acre of land." The whole acre
divided into four denotes the bissextile period of four years. The abbreviation
of this figure of a field in four divisions, is manifestly the letter ha or het,
the seventh in the Samaritan alphabet; and in general all the letters of the
alphabet are merely astronomical hieroglyphics; and it is for this reason that
the mode of writing is from right to left, like the march of the stars.--"They
denote a prophet by the image of a dog, because the dog star (Anoubis) by its
rising gives notice of the inundation. Noubi, in Hebrew signifies prophet--They
represent inundation by a lion, because it takes place under that sign: and
hence, says Plutarch, the custom of placing at the gates of temples figures of
lions with water issuing from their mouths.-- They express the idea of God and
destiny by a star. They also represent God, says Porphyry, by a black stone,
because his nature is dark and obscure. All white things express the celestial
and luminous Gods: all circular ones the world, the moon, the sun, the orbits;
all semicircular ones, as bows and crescents are descriptive of the moon. Fire
and the Gods of Olympus they represent by pyramids and obelisks (the name of the
sun, Baal, is found in this latter word): the sun by a cone (the mitre of Osiris):
the earth, by a cylinder (which revolves): the generative power of the air by
the phalus, and that of the earth by a triangle, emblem of the female organ.
Euseb. Proecep. Evang. p. 98.
"Clay, says Jamblicus de Symbolis, sect. 7, c. 2. denotes matter, the
generative and nutrimental power, every thing which receives the warmth and
fermentation of life."
"A man sitting upon the Lotos or Nenuphar, represents the moving spirit (the
sun) which, in like manner as that plant lives in the water without any
communication with clay, exists equally distinct from matter, swimming in empty
space, resting on itself: it is round also in all its parts, like the leaves,
the flowers, and the fruit of the Lotos. (Brama has the eyes of the Lotos, says
Chasler Nesdirsen, to denote his intelligence: his eye swims over every thing,
like the flower of the Lotos on the waters.) A man at the helm of a ship, adds
Jamblicus, is descriptive of the sun which governs all. And Porphyry tells us
that the sun is also represented by a man in a ship resting upon an amphibious
crocodile (emblem of air and water).
"At Elephantine they worshipped the figure of a man in a sitting posture,
painted blue, having the head of a ram, and the horns of a goat which
encompassed a disk; all which represented the sun and moon's conjunction at the
sign of the ram; the blue color denoting the power of the moon, at the period of
junction, to raise water into the clouds. Euseb. Proecep. Evang. p. 116.
"The hawk is an emblem of the sun and of light, on account of his rapid
flight and his soaring into the highest regions of the air where light abounds.
A fish is the emblem of aversion, and the Hippopotamus of violence, because
it is said to kill its father and to ravish its mother. Hence, says Plutarch,
the emblematical inscription of the temple of Sais, where we see painted on the
vestibule, 1. A child, 2. An old man, 3. A hawk, 4. A fish, 5. A hippopotamus:
which signify, 1. Entrance, into life, 2. Departure, 3. God, 4. Hates, 5.
Injustice. See Isis and Osiris.
"The Egyptians, adds he, represent the world by a Scarabeus, because this
insect pushes, in a direction contrary to that in which it proceeds, a ball
containing its eggs, just as the heaven of the fixed stars causes the revolution
of the sun, (the yolk of an egg) in an opposite direction to its own.
"They represent the world also by the number five, being that of the
elements, which, says Diodorus, are earth, water, air, fire, and ether, or
spiritus. The Indians have the same number of elements, and according to
Macrobius's mystics, they are the supreme God, or primum mobile, the
intelligence, or mens, born of him, the soul of the world which proceeds from
him, the celestial spheres, and all things terrestrial. Hence, adds Plutarch,
the analogy between the Greek pente, five, and pan all.
"The ass," says he again, "is the emblem of Typhon, because like that animal
he is of a reddish color. Now Typhon signifies whatever is of a mirey or clayey
nature; (and in Hebrew I find the three words clay, red, and ass to be formed
from the same root hamr. Jamblicus has farther told us that clay was the emblem
of matter and he elsewhere adds, that all evil and corruption proceeded from
matter; which compared with the phrase of Macrobius, all is perishable, liable
to change in the celestial sphere, gives us the theory, first physical, then
moral, of the system of good and evil of the ancients."
"Finally, a third cause of confusion was the civil organization of ancient
states. When the people began to apply themselves to agriculture, the formation
of a rural calendar, requiring a continued series of astronomical observations,
it became necessary to appoint certain individuals charged with the functions of
watching the appearance and disappearance of certain stars, to foretell the
return of the inundation, of certain winds, of the rainy season, the proper time
to sow every kind of grain. These men, on account of their service, were exempt
from common labor, and the society provided for their maintenance. With this
provision, and wholly employed in their observations, they soon became
acquainted with the great phenomena of nature, and even learned to penetrate the
secret of many of her operations. They discovered the movement of the stars and
planets, the coincidence of their phases and returns with the productions of the
earth and the action of vegetation; the medicinal and nutritive properties of
plants and fruits; the action of the elements, and their reciprocal affinities.
Now, as there was no other method of communicating the knowledge of these
discoveries but the laborious one of oral instruction, they transmitted it only
to their relations and friends, it followed therefore that all science and
instruction were confined to a few families, who, arrogating it to themselves as
an exclusive privilege, assumed a professional distinction, a corporation
spirit, fatal to the public welfare. This continued succession of the same
researches and the same labors, hastened, it is true, the progress of knowledge;
but by the mystery which accompanied it, the people were daily plunged in deeper
shades, and became more superstitious and more enslaved. Seeing their fellow
mortals produce certain phenomena, announce, as at pleasure, eclipses and
comets, heal diseases, and handle venomous serpents, they thought them in
alliance with celestial powers; and, to obtain the blessings and avert the evils
which they expected from above, they took them for mediators and interpreters;
and thus became established in the bosom of every state sacrilegious
corporations of hypocritical and deceitful men, who centered all powers in
themselves; and the priests, being at once astronomers, theologians,
naturalists, physicians, magicians, interpreters of the gods, oracles of men,
and rivals of kings, or their accomplices, established, under the name of
religion, an empire of mystery and a monopoly of instruction, which to this day
have ruined every nation. . . ."
Here the priests of all the groups interrupted the orator, and with loud cries
accused him of impiety, irreligion, blasphemy; and endeavored to cut short his
discourse; but the legislator observing that this was only an exposition of
historical facts, which, if false or forged, would be easily refuted; that
hitherto the declaration of every opinion had been free, and without this it
would be impossible to discover the truth, the orator proceeded:
"Now, from all these causes, and from the continual associations of ill-assorted
ideas, arose a mass of disorders in theology, in morals, and in traditions;
first, because the animals represented the stars, the characters of the animals,
their appetites, their sympathies, their aversions, passed over to the gods, and
were supposed to be their actions; thus, the god Ichneumon made war against the
god Crocodile; the god Wolf liked to eat the god Sheep; the god Ibis devoured
the god Serpent; and the deity became a strange, capricious, and ferocious
being, whose idea deranged the judgment of man, and corrupted his morals and his
reason.
"Again, because in the spirit of their worship every family, every nation, took
for its special patron a star or a constellation, the affections or antipathies
of the symbolic animal were transferred to its sectaries; and the partisans of
the god Dog were enemies to those of the god Wolf;* those who adored the god Ox
had an abhorrence to those who ate him; and religion became the source of hatred
and hostility,--the senseless cause of frenzy and superstition.
* These are properly the words of Plutarch, who relates that those various
worships were given by a king of Egypt to the different towns to disunite and
enslave them, and these kings had been taken from the cast of priests. See Isis
and Osiris.
"Besides, the names of those animal-stars having, for this same reason of
patronage, been conferred on countries, nations, mountains, and rivers, these
objects were taken for gods, and hence followed a mixture of geographical,
historical, and mythological beings, which confounded all traditions.
"Finally, by the analogy of actions which were ascribed to them, the god-stars,
having been taken for men, for heroes, for kings, kings and heroes took in their
turn the actions of gods for models, and by imitation became warriors,
conquerors, proud, lascivious, indolent, sanguinary; and religion consecrated
the crimes of despots, and perverted the principles of government.
IV. Fourth system. Worship of two Principles, or
Dualism.
"In the mean time, the astronomical priests, enjoying peace and abundance in
their temples, made every day new progress in the sciences, and the system of
the world unfolding gradually to their view, they raised successively various
hypotheses as to its agents and effects, which became so many theological
systems.
"The voyages of the maritime nations and the caravans of the nomads of Asia and
Africa, having given them a knowledge of the earth from the Fortunate Islands to
Serica, and from the Baltic to the sources of the Nile, the comparison of the
phenomena of the various zones taught them the rotundity of the earth, and gave
birth to a new theory. Having remarked that all the operations of nature during
the annual period were reducible to two principal ones, that of producing and
that of destroying; that on the greater part of the globe these two operations
were performed in the intervals of the two equinoxes; that is to say, during the
six months of summer every thing was procreating and multiplying, and that
during winter everything languished and almost died; they supposed in Nature two
contrary powers, which were in a continual state of contention and exertion; and
considering the celestial sphere in this view, they divided the images which
they figured upon it into two halves or hemispheres; so that the constellations
which were on the summer heaven formed a direct and superior empire; and those
which were on the winter heaven composed an antipode and inferior empire.
Therefore, as the constellations of summer accompanied the season of long, warm,
and unclouded days, and that of fruits and harvests, they were considered as the
powers of light, fecundity, and creation; and, by a transition from a physical
to a moral sense, they became genii, angels of science, of beneficence, of
purity and virtue. And as the constellations of winter were connected with long
nights and polar fogs, they were the genii of darkness, of destruction, of
death; and by transition, angels of ignorance, of wickedness, of sin and vice.
By this arrangement the heaven was divided into two domains, two factions; and
the analogy of human ideas already opened a vast field to the errors of
imagination; but the mistake and the illusion were determined, if not occasioned
by a particular circumstance. (Observe plate Astrological Heaven of the
Ancients.)
"In the projection of the celestial sphere, as traced by the astronomical
priests,* the zodiac and the constellations, disposed in circular order,
presented their halves in diametrical opposition; the hemisphere of winter,
antipode of that of summer, was adverse, contrary, opposed to it. By a continual
metaphor, these words acquired a moral sense; and the adverse genii, or angels,
became revolted enemies.** From that moment all the astronomical history of the
constellations was changed into a political history ; the heavens became a human
state, where things happened as on the earth. Now, as the earthly states, the
greater part despotic, had already their monarchs, and as the sun was apparently
the monarch of the skies, the summer hemisphere (empire of light) and its
constellations (a nation of white angels) had for king an enlightened God, a
creator intelligent and good. And as every rebel faction must have its chief,
the heaven of winter, the subterranean empire of darkness and woe, and its
stars, a nation of black angels, giants and demons, had for their chief a
malignant genius, whose character was applied by different people to the
constellation which to them was the most remarkable. In Egypt it was at first
the Scorpion, first zodiacal sign after Libra, and for a long time chief of the
winter signs ; then it was the Bear, or the polar Ass, called Typhon, that is to
say, deluge,** on account of the rains which deluge the earth during the
dominion of that star. At a later period,*** in Persia,**** it was the Serpent,
who, under the name of Abrimanes, formed the basis of the system of Zoroaster;
and it is the same, O Christians and Jews! that has become your serpent of Eve
(the celestial virgin,) and that of the cross; in both cases it is the emblem of
Satan, the enemy and great adversary of the Ancient of Days, sung by Daniel.
* The ancient priests had three kinds of spheres, which it may be useful to
make known to the reader.
"We read in Eusebius," says Porphyry, "that Zoroaster was the first who,
having fixed upon a cavern pleasantly situated in the mountains adjacent to
Persia, formed the idea of consecrating it to Mithra (the sun) creator and
father of all things: that is to say, having made in this cavern several
geometrical divisions, representing the seasons and the elements, he imitated on
a small scale the order and disposition of the universe by Mithra. After
Zoroaster, it became a custom to consecrate caverns for the celebration of
mysteries: so that in like manner as temples were dedicated to the Gods, rural
altars to heroes and terrestrial deities, etc., subterranean abodes to infernal
deities, so caverns and grottoes were consecrated to the world, to the universe,
and to the nymphs: and from hence Pythagoras and Plato borrowed the idea of
calling the earth a cavern, a cave, de Antro Nympharum.
Such was the first projection of the sphere in relief; though the Persians
give the honor of the invention to Zoroaster, it is doubtless due to the
Egyptians; for we may suppose from this projection being the most simple that it
was the most ancient; the caverns of Thebes, full of similar pictures, tend to
strengthen this opinion.
The following was the second projection: "The prophets or hierophants," says
Bishop Synnesius, "who had been initiated in the mysteries, do not permit the
common workmen to form idols or images of the Gods; but they descend themselves
into the sacred caves, where they have concealed coffers containing certain
spheres upon which they construct those images secretly and without the
knowledge of the people, who despise simple and natural things and wish for
prodigies and fables." (Syn. in Calvit.) That is, the ancient priests had
armillary spheres like ours; and this passage, which so well agrees with that of
Chaeremon, gives us the key to all their theological astrology.
Lastly, they had flat models of the nature of Plate V. with the difference
that they were of a very complicated nature, having every fictitious division of
decan and subdecan, with the hieroglyphic signs of their influence. Kircher has
given us a copy of one of them in his Egyptian Oedipus, and Gybelin a figured
fragment in his book of the calendar (under the name of the Egyptian Zodiac).
The ancient Egyptians, says the astrologer Julius Firmicus, (Astron. lib. ii.
and lib. iv., c. 16), divide each sign of the Zodiac into three sections; and
each section was under the direction of an imaginary being whom they called
decan or chief of ten; so that there were three decans a month, and thirty- six
a year. Now these decans, who were also called Gods (Theoi), regulated the
destinies of mankind--and they were placed particularly in certain stars. They
afterwards imagined in every ten three other Gods, whom they called arbiters; so
that there were nine for every month, and these were farther divided into an
infinite number of powers. The Persians and Indians made their spheres on
similar plans; and if a picture thereof were to be drawn from the description
given by Scaliger at the end of Manilius, we should find in it a complete
explanation of their hieroglyphics, for every article forms one.
** If it was for this reason the Persians always wrote the name of Ahrimanes
inverted thus: ['Ahrimanes' upside down and backwards].
*** Typhon, pronounced Touphon by the Greeks, is precisely the touphan of the
Arabs, which signifies deluge; and these deluges in mythology are nothing more
than winter and the rains, or the overflowing of the Nile: as their pretended
fires which are to destroy the world, are simply the summer season. And it is
for this reason that Aristotle (De Meteor, lib. I. c. xiv), says, that the
winter of the great cyclic year is a deluge; and its summer a conflagration.
"The Egyptians," says Porphyry, "employ every year a talisman in remembrance of
the world: at the summer solstice they mark their houses, flocks and trees with
red, supposing that on that day the whole world had been set on fire. It was
also at the same period that they celebrated the pyrric or fire dance." And this
illustrates the origin of purification by fire and by water; for having
denominated the tropic of Cancer the gate of heaven, and the genial heat of
celestial fire, and that of Capricorn the gate of deluge or of water, it was
imagined that the spirit or souls who passed through these gates in their way to
and from heaven, were roasted or bathed: hence the baptism of Mithra; and the
passage through flames, observed throughout the East long before Moses.
**** That is when the ram became the equinoctial sign, or rather when the
alteration of the skies showed that it was no longer the bull.
"In Syria, it was the hog or wild boar, enemy of Adonis; because in that country
the functions of the Northern Bear were performed by the animal whose
inclination for mire and dirt was emblematic of winter. And this is the reason,
followers of Moses and Mahomet! that you hold him in horror, in imitation of the
priests of Memphis and Balbec, who detested him as the murderer of their God,
the sun. This likewise, O Indians! is the type of your Chib-en; and it has been
likewise the Pluto of your brethren, the Romans and Greeks; in like manner, your
Brama, God the creator, is only the Persian Ormuzd, and the Egyptian Osiris,
whose very name expresses creative power, producer of forms. And these gods
received a worship analogous to their attributes, real or imaginary; which
worship was divided into two branches, according to their characters. The good
god receives a worship of love and joy, from which are derived all religious
acts of gaiety, such as festivals, dances, banquets, offerings of flowers, milk,
honey, perfumes; in a word, everything grateful to the senses and to the soul.*
The evil god, on the contrary, received a worship of fear and pain; whence
originated all religious acts of the gloomy sort,** tears, desolations,
mournings, self-denials, bloody offerings, and cruel sacrifices.
* All the ancient festivals respecting the return and exaltation of the sun
were of this description: hence the hilaria of the Roman calendar at the period
of the passage, Pascha, of the vernal equinox. The dances were imitations of the
march of the planets. Those of the Dervises still represent it to this day.
** "Sacrifices of blood," says Porphyry, "were only offered to Demons and
evil Genii to avert their wrath. Demons are fond of blood, humidity, stench."
Apud. Euseb. Proep. Ev., p. 173.
"The Egyptians," says Plutarch, "only offer bloody victims to Typhon. They
sacrifice to him a red ox, and the animal immolated is held in execration and
loaded with all the sins of the people." The goat of Moses. See Isis and Osiris.
Strabo says, speaking of Moses, and the Jews, "Circumcision and the
prohibition of certain kinds of meat sprung from superstition." And I observe,
respecting the ceremony of circumcision, that its object was to take from the
symbol of Osiris, (Phallus) the pretended obstacle to fecundity: an obstacle
which bore the seal of Typhon, "whose nature," says Plutarch, "is made up of all
that hinders, opposes, causes obstruction."
"Hence arose that distinction of terrestrial beings into pure and impure, sacred
and abominable, according as their species were of the number of the
constellations of one of these two gods, and made part of his domain; and this
produced, on the one hand, the superstitions concerning pollutions and
purifications; and, on the other, the pretended efficacious virtues of amulets
and talismans.
"You conceive now," continued the orator, addressing himself to the Persians,
the Indians, the Jews, the Christians, the Mussulmans, "you conceive the origin
of those ideas of battles and rebellions, which equally abound in all your
mythologies. You see what is meant by white and black angels, your cherubim and
seraphim, with heads of eagles, of lions, or of bulls; your deus, devils,
demons, with horns of goats and tails of serpents; your thrones and dominions,
ranged in seven orders or gradations, like the seven spheres of the planets; all
beings acting the same parts, and endowed with the same attributes in your
Vedas, Bibles, and Zend- avestas, whether they have for chiefs Ormuzd or Brama,
Typhon or Chiven, Michael or Satan;--whether they appear under the form of
giants with a hundred arms and feet of serpents, or that of gods metamorphosed
into lions, storks, bulls or cats, as they are in the sacred fables of the
Greeks and Egyptians. You perceive the successive filiation of these ideas, and
how, in proportion to their remoteness from their source, and as the minds of
men became refined, their gross forms have been polished, and rendered less
disgusting.
"But in the same manner as you have seen the system of two opposite principles
or gods arise from that of symbols, interwoven into its texture, your attention
shall now be called to a new system which has grown out of this, and to which
this has served in its turn as the basis and support.
V. Moral and Mystical Worship, or System of a Future
State.
"Indeed, when the vulgar heard speak of a new heaven and another world, they
soon gave a body to these fictions; they erected therein a real theatre of
action, and their notions of astronomy and geography served to strengthen, if
not to originate, this illusion.
"On the one hand, the Phoenician navigators who passed the pillars of Hercules,
to fetch the tin of Thule and the amber of the Baltic, related that at the
extremity of the world, the end of the ocean (the Mediterranean), where the sun
sets for the countries of Asia, were the Fortunate Islands, the abode of eternal
spring; and beyond were the hyperborean regions, placed under the earth
(relatively to the tropics) where reigned an eternal night.* From these stories,
misunderstood, and no doubt confusedly related, the imagination of the people
composed the Elysian fields,** regions of delight, placed in a world below,
having their heaven, their sun, and their stars; and Tartarus, a place of
darkness, humidity, mire, and frost. Now, as man, inquisitive of that which he
knows not, and desirous of protracting his existence, had already interrogated
himself concerning what was to become of him after his death, as he had early
reasoned on the principle of life which animates his body, and which leaves it
without deforming it, and as he had imagined airy substances, phantoms, and
shades, he fondly believed that he should continue, in the subterranean world,
that life which it was too painful for him to lose; and these lower regions
seemed commodious for the reception of the beloved objects which he could not
willingly resign.
* Nights of six months duration.
** Aliz, in the Phoenician or Hebrew language signifies dancing and joyous.
"On the other hand, the astrological and geological priests told such stories
and made such descriptions of their heavens, as accorded perfectly well with
these fictions. Having, in their metaphorical language, called the equinoxes and
solstices the gates of heaven, the entrance of the seasons, they explained these
terrestrial phenomena by saying, that through the gate of horn (first the bull,
afterwards the ram) and through the gate of Cancer, descended the vivifying
fires which give life to vegetation in the spring, and the aqueous spirits which
bring, at the solstice, the inundation of the Nile; that through the gate of
ivory (Libra, formerly Sagittarius, or the bowman) and that of Capricorn, or the
urn, the emanations or influences of the heavens returned to their source, and
reascended to their origin; and the Milky Way, which passed through the gates of
the solstices, seemed to be placed there to serve them as a road or vehicle.*
Besides, in their atlas, the celestial scene presented a river (the Nile,
designated by the windings of the hydra), a boat, (the ship Argo) and the dog
Sirius, both relative to this river, whose inundation they foretold. These
circumstances, added to the preceding, and still further explaining them,
increased their probability, and to arrive at Tartarus or Elysium, souls were
obliged to cross the rivers Styx and Acheron in the boat of the ferryman Charon,
and to pass through the gates of horn or ivory, guarded by the dog Cerberus.
Finally, these inventions were applied to a civil use, and thence received a
further consistency.
*See Macrob. Som. Scrip. c. 12.
"Having remarked that in their burning climate the putrefaction of dead bodies
was a cause of pestilential diseases, the Egyptians, in many of their towns, had
adopted the practice of burying their dead beyond the limits of the inhabited
country, in the desert of the West. To go there, it was necessary to pass the
channels of the river, and consequently to be received into a boat, and pay
something to the ferryman, without which the body, deprived of sepulture, must
have been the prey of wild beasts. This custom suggested to the civil and
religious legislators the means of a powerful influence on manners; and,
addressing uncultivated and ferocious men with the motives of filial piety and a
reverence for the dead, they established, as a necessary condition, their
undergoing a previous trial, which should decide whether the deceased merited to
be admitted to the rank of the family in the black city. Such an idea accorded
too well with all the others, not to be incorporated with them: the people soon
adopted it; and hell had its Minos and its Rhadamanthus, with the wand, the
bench, the ushers, and the urn, as in the earthly and civil state. It was then
that God became a moral and political being, a lawgiver to men, and so much the
more to be dreaded, as this supreme legislator, this final judge, was
inaccessible and invisible. Then it was that this fabulous and mythological
world, composed of such odd materials and disjointed parts, became a place of
punishments and of rewards, where divine justice was supposed to correct what
was vicious and erroneous in the judgment of men. This spiritual and mystical
system acquired the more credit, as it took possession of man by all his natural
inclinations. The oppressed found in it the hope of indemnity, and the
consolation of future vengeance; the oppressor, expecting by rich offerings to
purchase his impunity, formed out of the errors of the vulgar an additional
weapon of oppression; the chiefs of nations, the kings and priests, found in
this a new instrument of domination by the privilege which they reserved to
themselves of distributing the favors and punishments of the great judge,
according to the merit or demerit of actions, which they took care to
characterize as best suited their system.
"This, then, is the manner in which an invisible and imaginary world has been
introduced into the real and visible one; this is the origin of those regions of
pleasure and pain, of which you Persians have made your regenerated earth, your
city of resurrection, placed under the equator, with this singular attribute,
that in it the blessed cast no shade.* Of these materials, Jews and Christians,
disciples of the Persians, have you formed your New Jerusalem of the Apocalypse,
your paradise, your heaven, copied in all its parts from the astrological heaven
of Hermes: and your hell, ye Mussulmans, your bottomless pit, surmounted by a
bridge, your balance for weighing souls and good works, your last judgment by
the angels Monkir and Nekir, are likewise modeled from the mysterious ceremonies
of the cave of Mithras** and your heaven differs not in the least from that of
Osiris, of Ormuzd, and of Brama.
* There is on this subject a passage in Plutarch, so interesting and
explanatory of the whole of this system, that we shall cite it entire. Having
observed that the theory of good and evil had at all times occupied the
attention of philosophers and theologians, he adds: "Many suppose there to be
two gods of opposite inclinations, one delighting in good, the other in evil;
the first of these is called particularly by the name of God, the second by that
of Genius or Demon. Zoroaster has denominated them Oromaze and Ahrimanes, and
has said that of whatever falls under the cognizance of our senses, light is the
best representation of the one, and darkness and ignorance of the other. He
adds, that Mithra is an intermediate being, and it is for this reason the
Persians call Mithra the mediator or intermediator. Each of these Gods has
distinct plants and animals consecrated to him: for example, dogs, birds and
hedge-hogs belong to the good Genius, and all aquatic animals to the evil one.
"The Persians also say, that Oromaze was born or formed out of the purest
light; Ahrimanes, on the contrary, out of the thickest darkness: that Oromaze
made six gods as good as himself, and Ahrimanes opposed to them six wicked ones:
that Oromaze afterwards multiplied himself threefold (Hermes trismegistus) and
removed to a distance as remote from the sun as the sun is remote from the earth
that he there formed stars, and, among others, Sirius, which he placed in the
heavens as a guard and sentinel. He made also twenty-four other Gods, which he
inclosed in an egg; but Ahrimanes created an equal number on his part, who broke
the egg, and from that moment good and evil were mixed (in the universe). But
Ahrimanes is one day to be conquered, and the earth to be made equal and smooth,
that all men may live happy.
"Theopompus adds, from the books of the Magi, that one of these Gods reigns
in turn every three thousand years during which the other is kept in subjection;
that they afterwards contend with equal weapons during a similar portion of
time, but that in the end the evil Genius will fall (never to rise again). Then
men will become happy, and their bodies cast no shade. The God who mediates all
these things reclines at present in repose, waiting till he shall be pleased to
execute them." See Isis and Osiris.
There is an apparent allegory through the whole of this passage. The egg is
the fixed sphere, the world: the six Gods of Oromaze are the six signs of
summer, those of Ahrimanes the six signs of winter. The forty-eight other Gods
are the forty-eight constellations of the ancient sphere, divided equally
between Ahrimanes and Oronmze. The office of Sirius, as guard and sentinel,
tells us that the origin of these ideas was Egyptian: finally, the expression
that the earth is to become equal and smooth, and that the bodies of happy
beings are to cast no shade, proves that the equator was considered as their
true paradise.
** In the caves which priests every where constructed, they celebrated
mysteries which consisted (says Origen against Celsus) in imitating the motion
of the stars, the planets and the heavens. The initiated took the name of
constellations, and assumed the figures of animals. One was a lion, another a
raven, and a third a ram. Hence the use of masks in the first representation of
the drama. See Ant. Devoile, vol. iii., p. 244. "In the mysteries of Ceres the
chief in the procession called himself the creator; the bearer of the torch was
denominated the sun; the person nearest to the altar, the moon; the herald or
deacon, Mercury. In Egypt there was a festival in which the men and women
represented the year, the age, the seasons, the different parts of the day, and
they walked in precession after Bacchus. Athen. lib. v., ch. 7. In the cave of
Mithra was a ladder with seven steps, representing the seven spheres of the
planets, by means of which souls ascended and descended. This is precisely the
ladder in Jacob's vision, which shows that at that epoch a the whole system was
formed. There is in the French king's library a superb volume of pictures of the
Indian Gods, in which the ladder is represented with the souls of men mounting
it."
VI. Sixth System. The Animated World, or Worship of
the Universe under diverse Emblems.
"While the nations were wandering in the dark labyrinth of mythology and fables,
the physical priests, pursuing their studies and enquiries into the order and
disposition of the universe, came to new conclusions, and formed new systems
concerning powers and first causes.
"Long confined to simple appearances, they saw nothing in the movement of the
stars but an unknown play of luminous bodies rolling round the earth, which they
believed the central point of all the spheres; but as soon as they discovered
the rotundity of our planet, the consequences of this first fact led them to new
considerations; and from induction to induction they rose to the highest
conceptions in astronomy and physics.
"Indeed, after having conceived this luminous idea, that the terrestrial globe
is a little circle inscribed in the greater circle of the heavens, the theory of
concentric circles came naturally into their hypothesis, to determine the
unknown circle of the terrestrial globe by certain known portions of the
celestial circle; and the measurement of one or more degrees of the meridian
gave with precision the whole circumference. Then, taking for a compass the
known diameter of the earth, some fortunate genius applied it with a bold hand
to the boundless orbits of the heavens; and man, the inhabitant of a grain of
sand, embracing the infinite distances of the stars, launches into the immensity
of space and the eternity of time: there he is presented with a new order of the
universe of which the atom-globe which he inhabited appeared no longer to be the
centre; this important post was reserved to the enormous mass of the sun; and
that body became the flaming pivot of eight surrounding spheres, whose movements
were henceforth subjected to precise calculations.
"It was indeed a great effort for the human mind to have undertaken to determine
the disposition and order of the great engines of nature; but not content with
this first effort, it still endeavored to develop the mechanism, and discover
the origin and the instinctive principle. Hence, engaged in the abstract and
metaphysical nature of motion and its first cause, of the inherent or incidental
properties of matter, its successive forms and its extension, that is to say, of
time and space unbounded, the physical theologians lost themselves in a chaos of
subtile reasoning and scholastic controversy.*
* Consult the Ancient Astronomy of M. Bailly, and you will find our
assertions respecting the knowledge of the priests amply proved.
"In the first place, the action of the sun on terrestrial bodies, teaching them
to regard his substance as a pure and elementary fire, they made it the focus
and reservoir of an ocean of igneous and luminous fluid, which, under the name
of ether, filled the universe and nourished all beings. Afterwards, having
discovered, by a physical and attentive analysis, this same fire, or another
perfectly resembling it, in the composition of all bodies, and having perceived
it to be the essential agent of that spontaneous movement which is called life
in animals and vegetation in plants, they conceived the mechanism and harmony of
the universe, as of a homogeneous whole, of one identical body, whose parts,
though distant, had nevertheless an intimate relation;* and the world was a
living being, animated by the organic circulation of an igneous and even
electrical fluid,** which, by a term of comparison borrowed first from men and
animals, had the sun for a heart and a focus.***
* These are the very words of Jamblicus. De Myst. Egypt.
** The more I consider what the ancients understood by ether and spirit, and
what the Indians call akache, the stronger do I find the analogy between it and
the electrial fluid. A luminous fluid, principle of warmth and motion, pervading
the universe, forming the matter of the stars, having small round particles,
which insinuate themselves into bodies, and fill them by dilating itself, be
their extent what it will. What can more strongly resemble electricity?
*** Natural philosophers, says Macrobius, call the sun the heart of the
world. Som. Scrip. c. 20. The Egyptians, says Plutarch, call the East the face,
the North the right side, and the South the left side of the world, because
there the heart is placed. They continually compare the universe to a man; and
hence the celebrated microcosm of the Alchymists. We observe, by the bye, that
the Alchymists, Cabalists, Free-masons, Magnetisers, Martinists, and every other
such sort of visionaries, are but the mistaken disciples of this ancient school:
we say mistaken, because, in spite of their pretensions, the thread of the
occult science is broken.
"From this time the physical theologians seem to have divided into several
classes; one class, grounding itself on these principles resulting from
observation; that nothing can be annihilated in the world; that the elements are
indestructible; that they change their combinations but not their nature; that
the life and death of beings are but the different modifications of the same
atoms; that matter itself possesses properties which give rise to all its modes
of existence; that the world is eternal,* or unlimited in space and duration;
said that the whole universe was God; and, according to them, God was a being,
effect and cause, agent and patient, moving principle and thing moved, having
for laws the invariable properties that constitute fatality; and this class
conveyed their idea by the emblem of Pan (the great whole); or of Jupiter, with
a forehead of stars, body of planets, and feet of animals; or of the Orphic
Egg,** whose yolk, suspended in the center of a liquid, surrounded by a vault,
represented the globe of the sun, swimming in ether in the midst of the vault of
heaven;*** sometimes by a great round serpent, representing the heavens where
they placed the moving principle, and for that reason of an azure color, studded
with spots of gold, (the stars) devouring his tail--that is, folding and
unfolding himself eternally, like the revolutions of the spheres; sometimes by
that of a man, having his feet joined together and tied, to signify immutable
existence, wrapped in a cloak of all colors, like the face of nature, and
bearing on his head a sphere of gold,**** emblem of the sphere of the stars; or
by that of another man, sometimes seated on the flower of the lotos borne on the
abyss of waters, sometimes lying on a pile of twelve cushions, denoting the
twelve celestial signs. And here, Indians, Japanese, Siamese, Tibetans, and
Chinese, is the theology, which, founded by the Egyptians and transmitted to
you, is preserved in the pictures which you compose of Brama, of Beddou, of
Somona-Kodom of Omito. This, ye Jews and Christians, is likewise the opinion of
which you have preserved a part in your God moving on the face of the waters, by
an allusion to the wind*5 which, at the beginning of the world, that is, the
departure of the sun from the sign of Cancer, announced the inundation of the
Nile, and seemed to prepare the creation.
* See the Pythagorean, Ocellus Lacunus.
** Vide Oedip. Aegypt. Tome II., page 205.
*** This comparison of the sun with the yolk of an egg refers: 1. To its
round and yellow figure; 2. To its central situation; 3. To the germ or
principle of life contained in the yolk. May not the oval form of the egg allude
to the elipsis of the orbs? I am inclined to this opinion. The word Orphic
offers a farther observation. Macrobius says (Som. Scrip. c. 14. and c. 20),
that the sun is the brain of the universe, and that it is from analogy that the
skull of a human being is round, like the planet, the seat of intelligence. Now
the word Oerph signifies in Hebrew the brain and its seat (cervix): Orpheus,
then, is the same as Bedou or Baits; and the Bonzes are those very Orphics which
Plutarch represents as quacks, who ate no meat, vended talismans and little
stones, and deceived individuals, and even governments themselves. See a learned
memoir of Freret sur les Orphiques, Acad. des Inscrp. vol. 25, in quarto.
**** See Porphyry in Eusebus. Proep. Evang., lib. 3, p. 115.
*5 The Northern or Etesian wind, which commences regularly at the solstice, with the inundation.
"But others, disgusted at the idea of a being at once effect and cause, agent
and patient, and uniting contrary natures in the same nature, distinguished the
moving principle from the thing moved; and premising that matter in itself was
inert they pretended that its properties were communicated to it by a distinct
agent, of which itself was only the cover or the case. This agent was called by
some the igneous principle, known to be the author of all motion; by others it
was supposed to be the fluid called ether, which was thought more active and
subtile; and, as in animals the vital and moving principle was called a soul, a
spirit, and as they reasoned constantly by comparisons, especially those drawn
from human beings, they gave to the moving principle of the universe the name of
soul, intelligence, spirit; and God was the vital spirit, which extended through
all beings and animated the vast body of the world. And this class conveyed
their idea sometimes by Youpiter,* essence of motion and animation, principle of
existence, or rather existence itself; sometimes by Vulcan or Phtha, elementary
principle of fire; or by the altar of Vesta, placed in the center of her temple
like the sun in the heavens; sometimes by Kneph, a human figure, dressed in dark
blue, having in one hand a sceptre and a girdle (the zodiac), with a cap of
feathers to express the fugacity of thought, and producing from his mouth the
great egg.
* This is the true pronunciation of the Jupiter of the Latins. . . .
Existence itself. This is the signification of the word You.
"Now, as a consequence of this system, every being containing in itself a
portion of the igneous and etherial fluid, common and universal mover, and this
fluid soul of the world being God, it followed that the souls of all beings were
portions of God himself partaking of all his attributes, that is, being a
substance indivisible, simple, and immortal; and hence the whole system of the
immortality of the soul, which at first was eternity.*
* In the system of the first spiritualists, the soul was not created with, or
at the same time as the body, in order to be inserted in it: its existence was
supposed to be anterior and from all eternity. Such, in a few words, is the
doctrine of Macrobius on this head. Som. Seip. passim.
"There exists a luminous, igneous, subtile fluid, which under the name of ether
and spiritus, fills the universe. It is the essential principle and agent of
motion and life, it is the Deity. When an earthly body is to be animated, a
small round particle of this fluid gravitates through the milky way towards the
lunar sphere; where, when it arrives, it unites with a grosser air, and becomes
fit to associate with matter: it then enters and entirely fills the body,
animates it, suffers, grows, increases, and diminishes with it; lastly, when the
body dies, and its gross elements dissolve, this incorruptible particle takes
its leave of it, and returns to the grand ocean of ether, if not retained by its
union with the lunar air: it is this air or gas, which, retaining the shape of
the body, becomes a phantom or ghost, the perfect representation of the
deceased. The Greeks called this phantom the image or idol of the soul; the
Pythagoreans, its chariot, its frame; and the Rabbinical school, its vessel, or
boat. When a man had conducted himself well in this world, his whole soul, that
is its chariot and ether, ascended to the moon, where a separation took place:
the chariot lived in the lunar Elysium, and the ether returned to the fixed
sphere, that is, to God: for the fixed heaven, says Macrobius, was by many
called by the name of God (c. 14). If a man had not lived virtuously, the soul
remained on earth to undergo purification, and was to wander to and fro, like
the ghosts of Homer, to whom this doctrine must have been known, since he wrote
after the time of Pherecydes and Pythagoras, who were its promulgators in
Greece. Herodotus upon this occasion says, that the whole romance of the soul
and its transmigrations was invented by the Egyptians, and propagated in Greece
by men, who pretended to be its authors. I know their names, adds he, but shall
not mention them (lib. 2). Cicero, however, has positively informed us, that it
was Pherecydes, master of Pythagoras. Tuscul. lib. 1, sect. 16. Now admitting
that this system was at that period a novelty, it accounts for Solomon's
treating it as a fable, who lived 130 years before Pherecydes. "Who knoweth,"
said he, "the spirit of a man that it goeth upwards? I said in my heart
concerning the estate of the sons of men, that God might manifest them and that
they might see that they themselves are beasts. For that which befalleth the
sons of men, befalleth beasts; even one thing befalleth them: as the one dieth,
so dieth the other; yea they have all one breath, so that a man hath no
pre-eminence above a beast: for all is vanity." Eccles. c. iii: v. 18.
And such had been the opinion of Moses, as a translator of Herodotus (M. Archer
of the Academy of Inscriptions) justly observes in note 389 of the second book;
where he says also that the immortality of the soul was not introduced among the
Hebrews till their intercourse with the Assyrians. In other respects, the whole
Pythagorean system, properly analysed, appears to be merely a system of physics
badly understood.
"Hence, also its transmigrations, known by the name of metempsychosis, that is,
the passage of the vital principle from one body to another; an idea which arose
from the real transmigration of the material elements. And behold, ye Indians,
ye Boudhists, ye Christians, ye Mussulmans! whence are derived all your opinions
on the spirituality of the soul; behold what was the source of the dreams of
Pythagoras and Plato, your masters, who were themselves but the echoes of
another, the last sect of visionary philosophers, which we will proceed to
examine.
VIII. Eighth system. The WORLD-MACHINE: Worship of
the Demi- Ourgos, or Grand Artificer.
"Hitherto the theologians, employing themselves in examining the fine and
subtile substances of ether or the generating fire, had not, however, ceased to
treat of beings palpable and perceptible to the senses; and theology continued
to be the theory of physical powers, placed sometimes exclusively in the stars,
and sometimes disseminated through the universe; but at this period, certain
superficial minds, losing the chain of ideas which had directed them in their
profound studies, or ignorant of the facts on which they were founded, distorted
all the conclusions that flowed from them by the introduction of a strange and
novel chimera. They pretended that this universe, these heavens, these stars,
this sun, differed in no respect from an ordinary machine; and applying to this
first hypothesis a comparison drawn from the works of art, they raised an
edifice of the most whimsical sophisms. A machine, said they, does not make
itself; it has had an anterior workman; its very existence proves it. The world
is a machine; therefore it had an artificer.*
* All the arguments of the spiritualists are founded on this. See Macrobius,
at the end of the second book, and Plato, with the comments of Marcilius Ficinus.
"Here, then, is the Demi-Ourgos or grand artificer, constituted God autocratical
and supreme. In vain the ancient philosophy objected to this by saying that the
artificer himself must have had parents and progenitors; and that they only
added another step to the ladder by taking eternity from the world, and giving
it to its supposed author. The innovators, not content with this first paradox,
passed on to a second; and, applying to their artificer the theory of the human
understanding, they pretended that the Demi-Ourgos had framed his machine on a
plan already existing in his understanding. Now, as their masters, the
naturalists, had placed in the regions of the fixed stars the great primum
mobile, under the name of intelligence and reason, so their mimics, the
spiritualists, seizing this idea, applied it to their Demi-Ourgos, and making it
a substance distinct and self-existent, they called it mens or logos (reason or
word). And, as they likewise admitted the existence of the soul of the world, or
solar principle, they found themselves obliged to compose three grades of divine
beings, which were: first, the Demi-Ourgos, or working god; secondly, the logos,
word or reason; thirdly, the spirit or soul (of the world).* And here,
Christians! is the romance on which you have founded your trinity; here is the
system which, born a heretic in the temples of Egypt, transported a pagan into
the schools of Greece and Italy, is now found to be good, catholic, and
orthodox, by the conversion of its partisans, the disciples of Pythagoras and
Plato, to Christianity.
* These are the real types of the Christian Trinity.
"It is thus that God, after having been, First, The visible and various action
of the meteors and the elements;
"Secondly, The combined powers of the stars, considered in their relations to
terrestrial beings;
Thirdly, These terrestrial beings themselves, by confounding the symbols with
their archetypes;
Fourthly, The double power of nature in its two principal operations of
producing and destroying;
"Fifthly, The animated world, with distinction of agent and patient, of effect
and cause;
"Sixthly, The solar principle, or the element of fire considered as the only
mover;
"Has thus become, finally, in the last resort, a chimerical and abstract being,
a scholastic subtilty, of substance without form, a body without a figure, a
very delirium of the mind, beyond the power of reason to comprehend. But vainly
does it seek in this last transformation to elude the senses; the seal of its
origin is imprinted upon it too deep to be effaced; and its attributes, all
borrowed from the physical attributes of the universe, such as immensity,
eternity, indivisibility, incomprehensibility; or on the moral affections of
man, such as goodness, justice, majesty; its names* even, all derived from the
physical beings which were its types, and especially from the sun, from the
planets, and from the world, constantly bring to mind, in spite of its
corrupters, indelible marks of its real nature.
* In our last analysis we found all the names of the Deity to be derived from
some material object in which it was supposed to reside. We have given a
considerable number of instances; let us add one more relative to our word God.
This is known to be the Deus of the Latins, and the Theos of the Greeks. Now by
the confession of Plato (in Cratylo), of Macrobius (Saturn, lib. 1, c. 24,) and
of Plutarch (Isis and Osiris) its root is thein, which signifies to wander, like
planein, that is to say, it is synonymous with planets; because, add our
authors, both the ancient Greeks and Barbarians particularly worshipped the
planets. I know that such enquiries into etymologies have been much decried: but
if, as is the case, words are the representative signs of ideas, the genealogy
of the one becomes that of the other, and a good etymological dictionary would
be the most perfect history of the human understanding. It would only be
necessary in this enquiry to observe certain precautions, which have hitherto
been neglected, and particularly to make an exact comparison of the value of the
letters of the different alphabets. But, to continue our subject, we shall add,
that in the Phoenician language, the word thah (with ain) signifies also to
wander, and appears to be the derivation of thein. If we suppose Deus to be
derived from the Greek Zeus, a proper name of You-piter, having zaw, I live, for
its root, its sense will be precisely that of you, and will mean soul of the
world, igneous principle. (See note p. 143). Div-us, which only signifies
Genius, God of the second order, appears to me to come from the oriental word
div substituted for dib, wolf and chacal, one of the emblems of the sun. At
Thebes, says Macrobius, the sun was painted under the form of a wolf or chacal,
for there are no wolves in Egypt. The reason of this emblem, doubtless, is that
the chacal, like the cock announces by its cries the sun's rising; and this
reason is confirmed by the analogy of the words lykos, wolf, and lyke, light of
the morning, whence comes lux.
Dius, which is to be understood also of the sun, must be derived from dih, a
hawk. "The Egyptians," says Porphyry (Euseb. Proecep. Evang. p. 92,) "represent
the sun under the emblem of a hawk, because this bird soars to the highest
regions of air where light abounds." And in reality we continually see at Cairo
large flights of these birds, hovering in the air, from whence they descend not
but to stun us with their shrieks, which are like the monosyllable dih: and
here, as in the preceding example, we find an analogy between the word dies,
day, light, and dius, god, sun.
"Such is the chain of ideas which the human mind had already run through at an
epoch previous to the records of history; and since their continuity proves that
they were the produce of the same series of studies and labors, we have every
reason to place their origin in Egypt, the cradle of their first elements. This
progress there may have been rapid; because the physical priests had no other
food, in the retirement of the temples, but the enigma of the universe, always
present to their minds; and because in the political districts into which that
country was for a long time divided, every state had its college of priests,
who, being by turns auxiliaries or rivals, hastened by their disputes the
progress of science and discovery.*
* One of the proofs that all these systems were invented in Egypt, is that
this is the only country where we see a complete body of doctrine formed from
the remotest antiquity.
Clemens Alexandrinus has transmitted to us (Stromat. lib. 6,) a curious
detail of the forty-two volumes which were borne in the procession of Isis. "The
priest," says he, "or chanter, carries one of the symbolic instruments of music,
and two of the books of Mercury; one containing hymns of the gods, the other the
list of kings. Next to him the horoscope (the regulator of time,) carries a palm
and a dial, symbols of astrology; he must know by heart the four books of
Mercury which treat of astrology: the first on the order of the planets, the
second on the risings of the sun and moon, and the two last on the rising and
aspect of the stars. Then comes the sacred author, with feathers on his head
(like Kneph) and a book in his hand, together with ink, and a reed to write
with, (as is still the practice among the Arabs). He must be versed in
hieroglyphics, must understand the description of the universe, the course of
the sun, moon, stars, and planets, be acquainted with the division of Egypt into
thirty-six nomes, with the course of the Nile, with instruments, measures,
sacred ornaments, and sacred places. Next comes the stole bearer, who carries
the cubit of justice, or measure of the Nile, and a cup for the libations; he
bears also in the procession ten volumes on the subject of sacrifices, hymns,
prayers, offerings, ceremonies, festivals. Lastly arrives the prophet, bearing
in his bosom a pitcher, so as to be exposed to view; he is followed by persons
carrying bread (as at the marriage of Cana.) This prophet, as president of the
mysteries, learns ten other sacred volumes, which treat of the laws, the gods,
and the discipline of the priests. Now there are in all forty-two volumes,
thirty-six of which are studied and got by heart by these personages, and the
remaining six are set apart to be consulted by the pastophores; they treat of
medicine, the construction of the human body (anatomy), diseases, remedies,
instruments, etc., etc."
We leave the reader to deduce all the consequences of an Encyclopedia. It is
ascribed to Mercury; but Jamblicus tells us that each book, composed by priests,
was dedicated to that god, who, on account of his title of genius or decan
opening the zodiac, presided over every enterprise. He is the Janus of the
Romans, and the Guianesa of the Indians, and it is remarkable that Yanus and
Guianes are homonymous. In short it appears that these books are the source of
all that has been transmitted to us by the Greeks and Latins in every science,
even in alchymy, necromancy, etc. What is most to be regretted in their loss is
that part which related to the principles of medicine and diet, in which the
Egyptians appear to have made a considerable progress, and to have delivered
many useful observations.
"There happened early on the borders of the Nile, what has since been
repeated in every country; as soon as a new system was formed its novelty
excited quarrels and schisms; then, gaining credit by persecution itself,
sometimes it effaced antecedent ideas, sometimes it modified and incorporated
them; then, by the intervention of political revolutions, the aggregation of
states and the mixture of nations confused all opinions; and the filiation of
ideas being lost, theology fell into a chaos, and became a mere logogriph of old
traditions no longer understood. Religion, having strayed from its object was
now nothing more than a political engine to conduct the credulous vulgar; and it
was used for this purpose, sometimes by men credulous themselves and dupes of
their own visions, and sometimes by bold and energetic spirits in pursuit of
great objects of ambition.
IX. Religion of Moses, or Worship of the Soul of the
World (You- piter).
"Such was the legislator of the Hebrews; who, wishing to separate his nation
from all others, and to form a distinct and solitary empire, conceived the
design of establishing its basis on religious prejudices, and of raising around
it a sacred rampart of opinions and of rites. But in vain did he prescribe the
worship of the symbols which prevailed in lower Egypt and in Phoenicia;* for his
god was nevertheless an Egyptian god, invented by those priests of whom Moses
had been the disciple; and Yahouh,** betrayed by its very name, essence (of
beings), and by its symbol, the burning bush, is only the soul of the world, the
moving principle which the Greeks soon after adopted under the same denomination
in their you- piter, regenerating being, and under that of Ei, existence,***
which the Thebans consecrated by the name of Kneph, which Sais worshipped under
the emblem of Isis veiled, with this inscription: I am al that has been, all
that is, and all that is to come, and no mortal has raised my veil; which
Pythagoras honored under the name of Vesta, and which the stoic philosophy
defined precisely by calling it the principle of fire. In vain did Moses wish to
blot from his religion every thing which had relation to the stars; many traits
call them to mind in spite of all he has done. The seven planetary luminaries of
the great candlestick; the twelve stones, or signs in the Urim of the high
priests; the feast of the two equinoxes, (entrances and gates of the two
hemispheres); the ceremony of the lamb, (the celestial ram then in his fifteenth
degree); lastly, the name even of Osiris preserved in his song,**** and the ark,
or coffer, an imitation of the tomb in which that God was laid, all remain as so
many witnesses of the filiation of his ideas, and of their extraction from the
common source.
* "At a certain period," says Plutarch (de Iside) "all the Egyptians have
their animal gods painted. The Thebans are the only people who do not employ
painters, because they worship a god whose form comes not under the senses, and
cannot be represented." And this is the god whom Moses, educated at Heliopolis,
adopted; but the idea was not of his invention.
** Such is the true pronunciation of the Jehovah of the moderns, who violate,
in this respect, every rule of criticism; since it is evident that the ancients,
particularly the eastern Syrians and Phoenicians, were acquainted neither with
the J nor the P which are of Tartar origin. The subsisting usage of the Arabs,
which we have re-established here, is confirmed by Diodorus, who calls the god
of Moses Iaw, (lib. 1), and Iaw and Yahouh are manifestly the same word: the
identity continues in that of You-piter; but in order to render it more
complete, we shall demonstrate the signification to be the same.
In Hebrew, that is to say, in one of the dialects of the common language of
lower Asia, Yahouh is the participle of the verb hih, to exist, to be, and
signifies existing: in other words, the principle of life, the mover or even
motion (the universal soul of beings). Now what is Jupiter? Let us hear the
Greeks and Latins explain their theology. "The Egyptians," says Diodorus, after
Manatho, priest of Memphis, "in giving names to the five elements, called
spirit, or ether, You-piter, on account of the true meaning of that word: for
spirit is the source of life, author of the vital principle in animals; and for
this reason they considered him as the father, the generator of beings." For the
same reason Homer says, father, and king of men and gods. (Diod. lib. 1, sect
1).
"Theologians," says Macrobius, "consider You-piter as the soul of the world."
Hence the words of Virgil: " Muses let us begin with You-piter; the world is
full of You-piter." (Somn. Scrip., ch. 17). And in the Saturnalia, he says,
"Jupiter is the sun himself." It was this also which made Virgil say, "The
spirit nourishes the life (of beings), and the soul diffused through the vast
members (of the universe), agitates the whole mass, and forms but one immense
body."
"Ioupiter," says the ancient verses of the Orphic sect, which originated in
Egypt; verses collected by Onomacritus in the days of Pisistratus, "Ioupiter,
represented with the thunder in his hand, is the beginning, origin, end, and
middle of all things: a single and universal power, he governs every thing;
heaven, earth, fire, water, the elements, day, and night. These are what
constitute his immense body: his eyes are the sun and moon: he is space and
eternity: in fine," adds Porphyry. "Jupiter is the world, the universe, that
which constitutes the essence and life of all beings. Now," continues the same
author, "as philosophers differed in opinion respecting the nature and
constituent parts of this god, and as they could invent no figure that should
represent all his attributes, they painted him in the form of a man. He is in a
sitting posture, in allusion to his immutable essence; the upper part of his
body is uncovered, because it is in the upper regions of the universe (the
stars) that he most conspicuously displays himself. He is covered from the waist
downwards, because respecting terrestrial things he is more secret and
concealed. He holds a scepter in his left hand, because on the left side is the
heart, and the heart is the seat of the understanding, which, (in human beings)
regulates every action." Euseb. Proeper. Evang., p 100.
The following passage of the geographer and philosopher, Strabo, removes
every doubt as to the identity of the ideas of Moses and those of the heathen
theologians.
"Moses, who was one of the Egyptian priests, taught his followers that it was
an egregious error to represent the Deity under the form of animals, as the
Egyptians did, or in the shape of man, as was the practice of the Greeks and
Africans. That alone is the Deity, said he, which constitutes heaven, earth, and
every living thing; that which we call the world, the sum of all things, nature;
and no reasonable person will think of representing such a being by the image of
any one of the objects around us. It is for this reason, that, rejecting every
species of images or idols, Moses wished the Deity to be worshipped without
emblems, and according to his proper nature; and he accordingly ordered a temple
worthy of him to be erected, etc. Geograph. lib. 16, p. 1104, edition of 1707.
The theology of Moses has, then, differed in no respect from that of his
followers, that is to say, from that of the Stoics and Epicureans, who consider
the Deity as the soul of the world. This philosophy appears to have taken birth,
or to have been disseminated when Abraham came into Egypt (200 years before
Moses), since he quitted his system of idols for that of the god Yahouh; so that
we may place its promulgation about the seventeenth or eighteenth century before
Christ; which corresponds with what we have said before.
As to the history of Moses, Diodorus properly represents it when he says,
lib. 34 and 40, "That the Jews were driven out of Egypt at a time of dearth,
when the country was full of foreigners, and that Moses, a man of extraordinary
prudence seized this opportunity of establishing his religion in the mountains
of Judea." It will seem paradoxical to assert, that the 600,000 armed men whom
he conducted thither ought to be reduced to 6,000; but I can confirm the
assertion by so many proofs drawn from the books themselves, that it will be
necessary to correct an error which appears to have arisen from the mistake of
the transcribers.
*** This was the monosyllable written on the gates of the temple of Delphos.
Plutarch has made it the subject of a dissertation.
**** These are the literal expressions of the book of Deuteronomy, chap.
XXXII. "The works of Tsour are perfect." Now Tsour has been translated by the
word creator; its proper signification is to give forms, and this is one of the
definitions of Osiris in Plutarch.
"Such also was Zoroaster; who, five centuries after Moses, and in the time of
David, revived and moralized among the Medes and Bactrians, the whole Egyptian
system of Osiris and Typhon, under the names Ormuzd and Ahrimanes; who called
the reign of summer, virtue and good; the reign of winter, sin and evil; the
renewal of nature in spring, creation of the world; the conjunction of the
spheres at secular periods, resurrection; and the Tartarus and Elysium of the
astrologers and geographers were named future life, hell and paradise. In a
word, he did nothing but consecrate the existing dreams of the mystical system.
XI. Budsoism, or Religion of the Samaneans.
"Such again are the propagators of the dismal doctrine of the Samaneans; who, on
the basis of the Metempsychosis, have erected the misanthropic system of
self-denial, and of privations; who, laying it down as a principle that the body
is only a prison where the soul lives in an impure confinement, that life is
only a dream, an illusion, and the world only a passage to another country, to a
life without end, placed virtue and perfection in absolute immobility, in the
destruction of all sentiment, in the abnegation of physical organs, in the
annihilation of all our being; whence resulted fasts, penances, macerations,
solitude, contemplations, and all the practices of the deplorable delirium of
the Anchorites.
XII. Brahmism, or Indian System.
"And such, too, were the founders of the Indian System; who, refining after
Zoroaster on the two principles of creation and destruction, introduced an
intermediary principle, that of preservation, and on their trinity in unity, of
Brama, Chiven, and Vichenou, accumulated the allegories of their ancient
traditions, and the alembicated subtilities of their metaphysics.
"These are the materials which existed in a scattered state for many centuries
in Asia; when a fortuitous concourse of events and circumstances, on the borders
of the Euphrates and the Mediterranean, served to form them into new
combinations.
"In constituting a separate nation, Moses strove in vain to defend it against
the invasion of foreign ideas. An invisible inclination, founded on the affinity
of their origin, had constantly brought back the Hebrews towards the worship of
the neighboring nations; and the commercial and political relations which
necessarily existed between them, strengthened this propensity from day to day.
As long as the constitution of the state remained entire, the coercive force of
the government and the laws opposed these innovations, and retarded their
progress; nevertheless the high places were full of idols; and the god Sun had
his chariot and horses painted in the palaces of the kings, and even in the
temples of Yahouh; but when the conquests of the sultans of Nineveh and Babylon
had dissolved the bands of civil power, the people, left to themselves and
solicited by their conquerors, restrained no longer their inclination for
profane opinions, and they were publicly established in Judea. First, the
Assyrian colonies, which came and occupied the lands of the tribes, filled the
kingdom of Samaria with dogmas of the Magi, which very soon penetrated into the
kingdom of Judea. Afterwards, Jerusalem being subjugated, the Egyptians, the
Syrians, the Arabs, entering this defenceless country, introduced their
opinions; and the religion of Moses was doubly mutilated. Besides the priests
and great men, being transported to Babylon and educated in the sciences of the
Chaldeans, imbibed, during a residence of seventy years, the whole of their
theology; and from that moment the dogmas of the hostile Genius (Satan), the
archangel Michael,* the ancient of days (Ormuzd), the rebel angels, the battles
in heaven, the immortality of the soul, and the resurrection, all unknown to
Moses, or rejected by his total silence respecting them, were introduced and
naturalized among the Jews.
* "The names of the angels and of the months, such as Gabriel, Michael, Yar,
Nisan, etc., came from Babylon with the Jews:" says expressly the Talmud of
Jerusalem. See Beousob. Hist. du Manich. Vol. II, p. 624, where he proves that
the saints of the Almanac are an imitation of the 365 angels of the Persians;
and Jamblicus in his Egyptian Mysteries, sect. 2, c. 3, speaks of angels,
archangels, seraphims, etc., like a true Christian.
"The emigrants returned to their country with these ideas; and their innovation
at first excited disputes between their partisans the Pharisees, and their
opponents the Saducees, who maintained the ancient national worship; but the
former, aided by the propensities of the people and their habits already
contracted, and supported by the Persians, their deliverers and masters, gained
the ascendant over the latter; and the Sons of Moses consecrated the theology of
Zoroaster.*
* "The whole philosophy of the gymnosophists," says Diogenes Laertius on the
authority of an ancient writer, "is derived from that of the Magi, and many
assert that of the Jews to have the same origin." Lib. 1. c. 9. Megasthenes, an
historian of repute in the days of Seleucus Nicanor, and who wrote particularly
upon India, speaking of the philosophy of the ancients respecting natural
things, puts the Brachmans and the Jews precisely on the same footing.
"A fortuitous analogy between two leading ideas was highly favorable to this
coalition, and became the basis of a last system, not less surprising in the
fortune it has had in the world, than in the causes of its formation.
"After the Assyrians had destroyed the kingdom of Samaria, some judicious men
foresaw the same destiny for Jerusalem, which they did not fail to predict and
publish; and their predictions had the particular turn of being terminated by
prayers for a re- establishment and regeneration, uttered in the form of
prophecies. The Hierophants, in their enthusiasm, had painted a king as a
deliverer, who was to re-establish the nation in its ancient glory; the Hebrews
were to become once more a powerful, a conquering nation, and Jerusalem the
capital of an empire extended over the whole earth.
"Events having realized the first part of these predictions, the ruin of
Jerusalem, the people adhered to the second with a firmness of belief in
proportion to their misfortunes; and the afflicted Jews expected, with the
impatience of want and desire, this victorious king and deliverer, who was to
come and save the nation of Moses, and restore the empire of David.
"On the other hand, the sacred and mythological traditions of preceding times
had spread through all Asia a dogma perfectly analogous. The cry there was a
great mediator, a final judge, a future saviour, a king, god, conqueror and
legislator, who was to restore the golden age upon earth,* to deliver it from
the dominion of evil, and restore men to the empire of good, peace, and
happiness. The people seized and cherished these ideas with so much the more
avidity, as they found in them a consolation under that deplorable state of
suffering into which they had been plunged by the devastations of successive
conquests, and the barbarous despotism of their governments. This conformity
between the oracles of different nations, and those of the prophets, excited the
attention of the Jews; and doubtless the prophets had the art to compose their
descriptions after the style and genius of the sacred books employed in the
Pagan mysteries. There was therefore a general expectation in Judea of a great
ambassador, a final Saviour; when a singular circumstance determined the epoch
of his coming.
* This is the reason of the application of the many Pagan oracles to Jesus,
and particularly the fourth eclogue of Virgil, and the Sybilline verses so
celebrated among the ancients.
"It is found in the sacred books of the Persians and Chaldeans, that the world,
composed of a total revolution of twelve thousand, was divided into two partial
revolutions; one of which, the age and reign of good, terminated in six
thousand; the other, the age and reign of evil, was to terminate in six thousand
more.
"By these records, the first authors had understood the annual revolution of the
great celestial orb called the world, (a revolution composed of twelve months or
signs, divided each into a thousand parts), and the two systematic periods, of
winter and summer, composed each of six thousand. These expressions, wholly
equivocal and badly explained, having received an absolute and moral, instead of
a physical and astrological sense, it happened that the annual world was taken
for the secular world, the thousand of the zodiacal divisions, for a thousand of
years; and supposing, from the state of things, that they lived in the age of
evil, they inferred that it would end with the six thousand pretended years.*
* We have already seen this tradition current among the Tuscans; it was
disseminated through most nations, and shows us what we ought to think of all
the pretended creations and terminations of the world, which are merely the
beginnings and endings of astronomical periods invented by astrologers. That of
the year or solar revolution, being the most simple and perceptible, served as a
model to the rest, and its comparison gave rise to the most whimsical ideas. Of
this description is the idea of the four ages of the world among the Indians.
Originally these four ages were merely the four seasons; and as each season was
under the supposed influence of a planet, it bore the name of the metal
appropriated to that planet; thus spring was the age of the sun, or of gold;
summer the age of the moon, or of silver; autumn the age of Venus, or of brass;
and winter the age of Mars, or of iron. Afterwards when astronomers invented the
great year of 25 and 36 thousand common years, which had for its object the
bringing back all the stars to one point of departure and a general conjunction,
the ambiguity of the terms introduced a similar ambiguity of ideas; and the
myriads of celestial signs and periods of duration which were thus measured were
easily converted into so many revolutions of the sun. Thus the different periods
of creation which have been so great a source of difficulty and misapprehension
to curious enquirers, were in reality nothing more than hypothetical
calculations of astronomical periods. In the same manner the creation of the
world has been attributed to different seasons of the year, just as these
different seasons have served for the fictitious period of these conjunctions;
and of consequence has been adopted by different nations for the commencement of
an ordinary year. Among the Egyptians this period fell upon the summer solstice,
which was the commencement of their year; and the departure of the spheres,
according to their conjectures, fell in like manner upon the period when the sun
enters cancer. Among the Persians the year commenced at first in the spring, or
when the sun enters Aries; and from thence the first Christians were led to
suppose that God created the world in the spring: this opinion is also favored
by the book of Genesis; and it is farther remarkable, that the world is not
there said to be created by the God of Moses (Yahouh), but by the Elohim or gods
in the plural, that is by the angels or genii, for so the word constantly means
in the Hebrew books. If we farther observe that the root of the word Elohim
signifies strong or powerful, and that the Egyptians called their decans strong
and powerful leaders, attributing to them the creation of the world, we shall
presently perceive that the book of Genesis affirms neither more nor less than
that the world was created by the decans, by those very genii whom, according to
Sanchoniathon, Mercury excited against Saturn, and who were called Elohim. It
may be farther asked why the plural substantive Elohim is made to agree with the
singular verb bara (the Elohim creates). The reason is that after the Babylonish
captivity the unity of the Supreme Being was the prevailing opinion of the Jews;
it was therefore thought proper to introduce a pious solecism in language, which
it is evident had no existence before Moses; thus in the names of the children
of Jacob many of them are compounded of a plural verb, to which Elohim is the
nominative case understood, as Raouben (Reuben), they have looked upon me, and
Samaonni (Simeon), they have granted me my prayer; to wit, the Elohim. The
reason of this etymology is to be found in the religious creeds of the wives of
Jacob, whose gods were the taraphim of Laban, that is, the angels of the
Persians, and Egyptian decans.
"Now, according to calculations admitted by the Jews, they began to reckon near
six thousand years since the supposed creation of the world.* This coincidence
caused a fermentation in the public mind. Nothing was thought of but the
approaching end. They consulted the hierophants and the mystical books, which
differed as to the term; the great mediator, the final judge, was expected and
desired, to put an end to so many calamities. This being was so much spoken of,
that some person finally was said to have seen him; and a first rumor of this
sort was sufficient to establish a general certainty. Popular report became an
established fact: the imaginary being was realized; and all the circumstances of
mythological tradition, being assembled around this phantom, produced a regular
history, of which it was no longer permitted to doubt.
* According to the computation of the Seventy, the period elapsed consisted
of about 5,600 years, and this computation was principally followed. It is well
known how much, in the first ages of the church, this opinion of the end of the
world agitated the minds of men. In the sequel, the general councils encouraged
by finding that the general conflagration did not come, pronounced the
expectation that prevailed heretical, and its believers were called
Millenarians; a circumstance curious enough, since it is evident from the
history of the gospels that Jesus Christ was a Millenarian, and of consequence a
heretic.
"These mythological traditions recounted that, in the beginning, a woman and a
man had by their fall introduced sin and misery into the world. (Consult plate
of the Astrological Heaven of the Ancients.)
"By this was denoted the astronomical fact, that the celestial virgin and the
herdsman (Bootes), by setting heliacally at the autumnal equinox, delivered the
world to the wintry constellations, and seemed, on falling below the horizon, to
introduce into the world the genius of evil, Ahrimanes, represented by the
constellation of the Serpent.*
* "The Persians," says Chardin, "call the constellation of the serpent
Ophiucus, serpent of Eve: and this serpent Ophiucas or Ophioneus plays a similar
part in the theology of the Phoenicians," for Pherecydes, their disciple and the
master of Pythagoras, said "that Ophioneus Serpentinus had been chief of the
rebels against Jupiter." See Mars. Ficin. Apol. Socrat. p. m. 797, col. 2. I
shall add that ephah (with ain) signifies in Hebrew, serpent.
These traditions related that the woman had decoyed and seduced the man.*
* In a physical sense to seduce, seducere, means only to attract, to draw
after us.
"And in fact, the virgin, setting first, seems to draw the herdsman after her.
"That the woman tempted him by offering him fruit fair to the sight and good to
eat, which gave the knowledge of good and evil.
"And in fact, the Virgin holds in her hand a branch of fruit, which she seems to
offer to the Herdsman; and the branch, emblem of autumn, placed in the picture
of Mithra* between winter and summer, seems to open the door and give knowledge,
the key of good and evil.
* See this picture in Hyde, page 111, edition of 1760.
That this couple had been driven from the celestial garden, and that a cherub with a flaming sword had been placed at the gate to guard it.
"And in fact, when the virgin and the herdsman fall beneath the horizon, Perseus
rises on the other side;* and this Genius, with a sword in his hand, seems to
drive them from the summer heaven, the garden and dominion of fruits and
flowers.
* Rather the head of Medusa; that head of a woman once so beautiful, which
Perseus cut off and which beholds in his hand, is only that of the virgin, whose
head sinks below the horizon at the very moment that Perseus rises; and the
serpents which surround it are Orphiucus and the Polar Dragon, who then occupy
the zenith. This shows us in what manner the ancients composed all their figures
and fables. They took such constellations as they found at the same time on the
circle of the horizon, and collecting the different parts, they formed groups
which served them as an almanac in hieroglyphic characters. Such is the secret
of all their pictures, and the solution of all their mythological monsters. The
virgin is also Andromeda, delivered by Perseus from the whale that pursues her
(pro-sequitor).
That of this virgin should be born, spring up, an offspring, a child, who should
bruise the head of the serpent, and deliver the world from sin.
"This denotes the son, which, at the moment of the winter solstice, precisely
when the Persian Magi drew the horoscope of the new year, was placed on the
bosom of the Virgin, rising heliacally in the eastern horizon; on this account
he was figured in their astrological pictures under the form of a child suckled
by a chaste virgin,* and became afterwards, at the vernal equinox, the ram, or
the lamb, triumphant over the constellation of the Serpent, which disappeared
from the skies.
* Such was the picture of the Persian sphere, cited by Aben Ezra in the
Coelam Poeticum of Blaeu, p. 71. "The picture of the first decan of the Virgin,"
says that writer. "represents a beautiful virgin with flowing hair; sitting in a
chair, with two ears of corn in her hand, and suckling an infant, called Jesus
by some nations, and Christ in Greek."
In the library of the king of France is a manuscript in Arabic, marked 1165,
in which is a picture of the twelve signs; and that of the Virgin represents a
young woman with an infant by her side: the whole scene indeed of the birth of
Jesus is to be found in the adjacent part of the heavens. The stable is the
constellation of the charioteer and the goat, formerly Capricorn: a
constellation called proesepe Jovis Heniochi, stable of Iou; and the word Iou is
found in the name Iou-seph (Joseph). At no great distance is the ass of Typhon
(the great she-bear), and the ox or bull, the ancient attendants of the manger.
Peter the porter, is Janus with his keys and bald forehead: the twelve apostles
are the genii of the twelve months, etc. This Virgin has acted very different
parts in the various systems of mythology: she has been the Isis of the
Egyptians, who said of her in one of their inscriptions cited by Julian, the
fruit I have brought forth is the sun. The majority of traits drawn by Plutarch
apply to her, in the same manner as those of Osiris apply to Bootes: also the
seven principal stars of the she-bear, called David's chariot, were called the
chariot of Osiris (See Kirker); and the crown that is situated behind, formed of
ivy, was called Chen-Osiris, the tree of Osiris. The Virgin has likewise been
Ceres, whose mysteries were the same with those of Isis and Mithra; she has been
the Diana of the Ephesians; the great goddess of Syria, Cybele, drawn by lions;
Minerva, the mother of Bacchus; Astraea, a chaste virgin taken up into heaven at
the end of a golden age; Themis at whose feet is the balance that was put in her
hands; the Sybil of Virgil, who descends into hell, or sinks below the
hemisphere with a branch in her hand, etc.
That, in his infancy, this restorer of divine and celestial nature would live
abased, humble, obscure and indigent.
"And this, because the winter sun is abased below the horizon; and that this
first period of his four ages or seasons, is a time of obscurity, scarcity,
fasting, and want.
"That, being put to death by the wicked, he had risen gloriously; that he had
reascended from hell to heaven, where he would reign forever
"This is a sketch of the life of the sun; who, finishing his career at the
winter solstice, when Typhon and the rebel angels gain the dominion, seems to be
put to death by them; but who soon after is born again, and rises* into the
vault of heaven, where he reigns.
* Resurgere, to rise a second time, cannot signify to return to life, but in
a metaphorical sense; but we see continually mistakes of this kind result from
the ambiguous meaning of the words made use of in ancient tradition.
"Finally, these traditions went so far as to mention even his astrological and
mythological names, and inform us that he was called sometimes Chris, that is to
say, preserver,* and from that, ye Indians, you have made your god Chrish-en or
Chrish-na; and, ye Greek and Western Christians, your Chris-tos, son of Mary, is
the same; sometimes he is called Yes, by the union of three letters, which by
their numerical value form the number 608, one of the solar periods.** And this,
Europeans, is the name which, with the Latin termination, is become your Yes-us
or Jesus, the ancient and cabalistic name attributed to young Bacchus, the
clandestine son (nocturnal) of the Virgin Minerva, who, in the history of his
whole life, and even of his death, brings to mind the history of the god of the
Christians, that is, of the star of day, of which they are each of them the
emblems."
* The Greeks used to express by X, or Spanish iota, the aspirated ha of the
Orientals, who said haris. In Hebrew heres signifies the sun, but in Arabic the
meaning of the radical word is, to guard, to preserve, and of haris, guardian,
preserver. It is the proper epithet of Vichenou, which demonstrates at once the
identity of the Indian and Christian Trinities, and their common origin. It is
manifestly but one system, which divided into two branches, one extending to the
east, and the other to the west, assumed two different forms: Its principal
trunk is the Pythagorean system of the soul of the world, or Iou-piter. The
epithet piter, or father, having been applied to the demi-ourgos of Plato, gave
rise to an ambiguity which caused an enquiry to be made respecting the son of
this father. In the opinion of the philosophers the son was understanding, Nous
and Logos, from which the Latins made their Verbum. And thus we clearly perceive
the origin of the eternal father and of the Verbum his son, proceeding from him
(Mens Ex Deo nata, says Macrobius): the oenima or spiritus mundi, was the Holy
Ghost; and it is for this reason that Manes, Pasilides, Valentinius, and other
pretended heretics of the first ages, who traced things to their source, said,
that God the Father was the supreme inaccessible light (that of the heaven, the
primum mobile, or the aplanes); the Son the secondary light resident in the sun,
and the Holy Ghost the atmosphere of the earth (See Beausob. vol. II, p. 586):
hence, among the Syrians, the representation of the Holy Ghost by a dove, the
bird of Venus Urania, that is of the air. The Syrians (says Nigidius de Germaico)
assert that a dove sat for a certain number of days on the egg of a fish, and
that from this incubation Venus was born: Sextus Empiricus also observes (Inst.
Pyrrh. lib. 3, c. 23) that the Syrians abstain from eating doves; which
intimates to us a period commencing in the sign Pisces, in the winter solstice.
We may farther observe, that if Chris comes from Harisch by a chin, it will
signify artificer, an epithet belonging to the sun. These variations, which must
have embarrassed the ancients, prove it to be the real type of Jesus, as had
been already remarked in the time of Tertullian. "Many, says this writer,
suppose with greater probability that the sun is our God, and they refer us to
the religion of the Persians." Apologet. c. 16.
** See a curious ode to the sun, by Martianus Capella, translated by Gebelin.
Here a great murmur having arisen among all the Christian groups, the Lamas, the
Mussulmans and the Indians called them to order, and the orator went on to
finish his discourse:
"You know at present," said he, "how the rest of this system was composed in the
chaos and anarchy of the three first centuries; what a multitude of singular
opinions divided the minds of men, and armed them with an enthusiasm and a
reciprocal obstinacy; because, being equally founded on ancient tradition, they
were equally sacred. You know how the government, after three centuries, having
embraced one of these sects, made it the orthodox, that is to say, the
pre-dominant religion, to the exclusion of the rest; which, being less in
number, became heretics; you know how and by what means of violence and
seduction this religion was propagated, extended, divided, and enfeebled; how,
six hundred years after the Christian innovation, another system was formed from
it and from that of the Jews; and how Mahomet found the means of composing a
political and theological empire at the expense of those of Moses and the vicars
of Jesus.
"Now, if you take a review of the whole history of the spirit of all religion,
you will see that in its origin it has had no other author than the sensations
and wants of man; that the idea of God has had no other type and model than
those of physical powers, material beings, producing either good or evil, by
impressions of pleasure or pain on sensitive beings; that in the formation of
all these systems the spirit of religion has always followed the same course,
and been uniform in its proceedings; that in all of them the dogma has never
failed to represent, under the name of gods, the operations of nature, and
passions and prejudices of men; that the moral of them all has had for its
object the desire of happiness and the aversion to pain; but that the people,
and the greater part of legislators, not knowing the route to be pursued, have
formed false, and therefore discordant, ideas of virtue and vice of good and
evil, that is to say, of what renders man happy or miserable; that in every
instance, the means and the causes of propagating and establishing systems have
exhibited the same scenes of passion and the same events; everywhere disputes
about words, pretexts for zeal, revolutions and wars excited by the ambition of
princes, the knavery of apostles, the credulity of proselytes, the ignorance of
the vulgar, the exclusive cupidity and intolerant arrogance of all. Indeed, you
will see that the whole history of the spirit of religion is only the history of
the errors of the human mind, which, placed in a world that it does not
comprehend, endeavors nevertheless to solve the enigma; and which, beholding
with astonishment this mysterious and visible prodigy, imagines causes, supposes
reasons, builds systems; then, finding one defective, destroys it for another
not less so; hates the error that it abandons, misconceives the one that it
embraces, rejects the truth that it is seeking, composes chimeras of discordant
beings; and thus, while always dreaming of wisdom and happiness, wanders blindly
in a labyrinth of illusion and doubt."
Thus spoke the orator in the name of those men who had studied the origin and
succession of religious ideas.
The theologians of various systems, reasoning on this discourse: "It is an
impious representation," said some, whose tendency is nothing less than to
overturn all belief, to destroy subordination in the minds of men, and
annihilate our ministry and power." "It is a romance," said others, "a tissue of
conjectures, composed with art, but without foundation." The moderate and
prudent men added: "Supposing all this to be true, why reveal these mysteries?
Doubtless our opinions are full of errors; but these errors are a necessary
restraint on the multitude. The world has gone thus for two thousand years; why
change it now?"
A murmur of disapprobation, which never fails to rise at every innovation, now
began to increase; when a numerous group of the common classes of people, and of
untaught men of all countries and of every nation, without prophets, without
doctors, and without doctrine, advancing in the circle, drew the attention of
the whole assembly; and one of them, in the name of all, thus addressed the
multitude:
"Mediators and arbiters of nations! the strange relations which have occupied
the present debate were unknown to us until this day. Our understanding,
confounded and amazed at so many statements, some of them learned, others absurd
and all incomprehensible, remains in uncertainty and doubt. One only reflection
has struck us: on reviewing so many prodigious facts, so many contradictory
assertions, we ask ourselves: What are all these discussions to us? What need
have we of knowing what passed five or six thousand years ago, in countries we
never heard of, and among men who will ever be unknown to us? True or false,
what interest have we in knowing whether the world has existed six thousand, or
twenty-five thousand years? Whether it was made of nothing, or of something; by
itself, or by a maker, who in his turn would require another maker? What! we are
not sure of what happens near us, and shall we answer for what happens in the
sun, in the moon, or in imaginary regions of space? We have forgotten our own
infancy, and shall we know the infancy of the world? And who will attest what no
one has seen? who will certify what no man comprehends?
"Besides, what addition or diminution will it make to our existence, to answer
yes or no to all these chimeras? Hitherto neither our fathers nor ourselves have
had the least knowledge or notion of them, and we do not perceive that we have
had on this account either more or less of the sun, more or less of subsistence,
more or less of good or of evil.
"If the knowledge of these things is so necessary, why have we lived as well
without it as those who have taken so much trouble concerning it? If this
knowledge is superfluous, why should we burden ourselves with it to-day?"
Then addressing himself to the doctors and theologians:
"What!" said he, "is it necessary that we, poor and ignorant men, whose every
moment is scarcely sufficient for the cares of life, and the labors of which you
take the profit,--is it necessary for us to learn the numberless histories that
you have recounted, to read the quantity of books that you have cited, and to
study the various languages in which they are composed! A thousand years of life
would not suffice--"
"It is not necessary," replied the doctors, "that you should acquire all this
science; we have it for you--"
"But even you," replied the simple men, "with all your science, you are not
agreed; of what advantage, then, is your science? Besides, how can you answer
for us? If the faith of one man is applicable to many, what need have even you
to believe? your fathers may have believed for you; and this would be
reasonable, since they have seen for you.
"Farther, what is believing, if believing influences no action? And what action
is influenced by believing, for instance, that the world is or is not eternal?"
"The latter would be offensive to God," said the doctors.
"How prove you that?" replied the simple men.
"In our books," answered the doctors.
"We do not understand them," returned the simple men.
"We understand them for you," said the doctors.
"That is the difficulty," replied the simple men. "By what right do you
constitute yourselves mediators between God and us?"
"By his orders," said the doctors.
"Where is the proof of these orders?" said the simple men.
"In our books," said the doctors.
"We understand them not," said the simple men; "and how came this just God to
give you this privilege over us? Why did this common father oblige us to believe
on a less degree of evidence than you? He has spoken to you; be it so; he is
infallible, and deceives you not. But it is you who speak to us! And who shall
assure us that you are not in error yourselves, or that you will not lead us
into error? And if we should be deceived, how will that just God save us
contrary to law, or condemn us on a law which we have not known?"
"He has given you the natural law," said the doctors.
"And what is the natural law?" replied the simple men. "If that law is
sufficient, why has he given any other? If it is not sufficient, why did he make
it imperfect?"
"His judgments are mysteries," said the doctors, "and his justice is not like
that of men."
"If his justice," replied the simple men, "is not like ours, by what rule are we
to judge of it? And, moreover, why all these laws, and what is the object
proposed by them?"
"To render you more happy," replied a doctor, "by rendering you better and more
virtuous. It is to teach man to enjoy his benefits, and not injure his fellows,
that God has manifested himself by so many oracles and prodigies."
"In that case," said the simple men, "there is no necessity for so many studies,
nor of such a variety of arguments; only tell us which is the religion that best
answers the end which they all propose."
Immediately, on this, every group, extolling its own morality above that of all
others, there arose among the different sects a new and most violent dispute.
"It is we," said the Mussulmans, "who possess the most excellent morals, who
teach all the virtues useful to men and agreeable to God. We profess justice,
disinterestedness, resignation to providence, charity to our brethren,
alms-giving, and devotion; we torment not the soul with superstitious fears; we
live without alarm, and die without remorse."
"How dare you speak of morals," answered the Christian priests, "you, whose
chief lived in licentiousness and preached impurity? You, whose first precept is
homicide and war? For this we appeal to experience: for these twelve hundred
years your fanatical zeal has not ceased to spread commotion and carnage among
the nations. If Asia, so flourishing in former times, is now languishing in
barbarity and depopulation, it is in your doctrine that we find the cause; in
that doctrine, the enemy of all instruction, which sanctifies ignorance, which
consecrates the most absolute despotism in the governors, imposes the most blind
and passive obedience in the people, that has stupefied the faculties of man,
and brutalized the nations.
"It is not so with our sublime and celestial morals; it was they which raised
the world from its primitive barbarity, from the senseless and cruel
superstitions of idolatry, from human sacrifices,* from the shameful orgies of
pagan mysteries; they it was that purified manners, proscribed incest and
adultery, polished savage nations, banished slavery, and introduced new and
unknown virtues, charity for men, their equality in the sight of God,
forgiveness and forgetfulness of injuries, the restraint of all the passions,
the contempt of worldly greatness, a life completely spiritual and completely
holy!"
* Read the cold declaration of Eusebius (Proep. Evang. lib. I, p. 11,), who
pretends that, since the coming of Christ, there have been neither wars, nor
tyrants, nor cannibals, nor sodomites, nor persons committing incest, nor
savages destroying their parents, etc. When we read these fathers of the church
we are astonished at their insincerity or infatuation.
"We admire," said the Mussulmans, "the ease with which you reconcile that
evangelical meekness, of which you are so ostentatious, with the injuries and
outrages with which you are constantly galling your neighbors. When you
criminate so severely the great man whom we revere, we might fairly retort on
the conduct of him whom you adore; but we scorn such advantages, and confining
ourselves to the real object in question, we maintain that the morals of your
gospel have by no means that perfection which you ascribe to them; it is not
true that they have introduced into the world new and unknown virtues: for
example, the equality of men in the sight of God,--that fraternity and that
benevolence which follow from it, were formal doctrines of the sect of the
Hermatics or Samaneans,* from whom you descend. As to the forgiveness of
injuries, the Pagans themselves had taught it; but in the extent that you give
it, far from being a virtue, it becomes an immorality, a vice. Your so much
boasted precept of turning one cheek after the other, is not only contrary to
every sentiment of man, but is opposed to all ideas of justice. It emboldens the
wicked by impunity, debases the virtuous by servility, delivers up the world to
despotism and tyranny, and dissolves all society. Such is the true spirit of
your doctrines. Your gospels in their precepts and their parables, never
represent God but as a despot without any rules of equity; a partial father
treating a debauched and prodigal son with more favor than his respectful and
virtuous children; a capricious master, who gives the same wages to workmen who
had wrought but one hour, as to those who had labored through the whole day; one
who prefers the last comers to the first. The moral is everywhere misanthropic
and antisocial; it disgusts men with life and with society; and tends only to
encourage hermitism and celibacy.
* The equality of mankind in a state of nature and in the eyes of God was one
of the principal tenets of the Samaneans, and they appear to be the only
ancients that entertained this opinion.
"As to the manner in which you have practised these morals, we appeal in our
turn to the testimony of facts. We ask whether it is this evangelical meekness
which has excited your interminable wars between your sects, your atrocious
persecutions of pretended heretics, your crusades against Arianism, Manicheism,
Protestantism, without speaking of your crusades against us, and of those
sacrilegious associations, still subsisting, of men who take an oath to continue
them?* We ask you whether it be gospel charity which has made you exterminate
whole nations in America, to annihilate the empires of Mexico and Peru; which
makes you continue to dispeople Africa and sell its inhabitants like cattle,
notwithstanding your abolition of slavery; which makes you ravage India and
usurp its dominions; and whether it be the same charity which, for three
centuries past, has led you to harrass the habitations of the people of three
continents, of whom the most prudent, the Chinese and Japanese, were constrained
to drive you off, that they might escape your chains and recover their internal
peace?"
* The oath taken by the knights of the Order of Malta, is to kill, or make
the Mahometans prisoners, for the glory of God.
Here the Bramins, the Rabbins, the Bonzes, the Chamans, the Priests of the
Molucca islands, and the coasts of Guinea, loading the Christian doctors with
reproaches: "Yes!" cried they, "these men are robbers and hypocrites, who preach
simplicity, to surprise confidence; humility, to enslave with more ease;
poverty, to appropriate all riches to themselves. They promise another world,
the better to usurp the present; and while they speak to you of tolerance and
charity, they burn, in the name of God, the men who do not worship him in their
manner."
"Lying priests," retorted the missionaries, "it is you who abuse the credulity
of ignorant nations to subjugate them. It is you who have made of your ministry
an art of cheating and imposture; you have converted religion into a traffic of
cupidity and avarice. You pretend to hold communications with spirits, and they
give for oracles nothing but your wills. You feign to read the stars, and
destiny decrees only your desires. You cause idols to speak, and the gods are
but the instruments of your passions. You have invented sacrifices and
libations, to collect for your own profit the milk of flocks, and the flesh and
fat of victims; and under the cloak of piety you devour the offerings of the
gods, who cannot eat, and the substance of the people who are forced to labor."
"And you," replied the Bramins, the Bonzes, the Chamans, "you sell to the
credulous living, your vain prayers for the souls of the dead. With your
indulgences and your absolutions you have usurped the power of God himself; and
making a traffic of his favors and pardons, you have put heaven at auction; and
by your system of expiations you have formed a tariff of crimes, which has
perverted all consciences."*
* As long as it shall be possible to obtain purification from crimes and
exemption from punishment by means of money or other frivolous practices; as
long as kings and great men shall suppose that building temples or instituting
foundations, will absolve them from the guilt of oppression and homicide; as
long as individuals shall imagine that they may rob and cheat, provided they
observe fast during Lent, go to confession, and receive extreme unction, it is
impossible there should exist in society any morality or virtue; and it is from
a deep conviction of truth, that a modern philosopher has called the doctrine of
expiations la verola des societes.
"Add to this," said the Imans, "that these men have invented the most insidious
of all systems of wickedness,--the absurd and impious obligation of recounting
to them the most intimate secrets of actions and of thoughts (confessions); so
their insolent curiosity has carried their inquisition even into the sanctuary
of the marriage bed,* and the inviolable recesses of the heart."
* Confession is a very ancient invention of the priests, who did not fail to
avail themselves of that means of governing. It was practised in the Egyptian,
Greek, Phrygian, Persian mysteries, etc. Plutarch has transmitted us the
remarkable answer of a Spartan whom a priest wanted to confess. "Is it to you or
to God I am to confess?" "To God," answered the priest: "In that case," replied
the Spartan, "man, begone!" (Remarkable Savings of the Lacedemonians.) The first
Christians confessed their faults publicly, like the Essenians. Afterwards,
priests began to be established, with power of absolution from the sin of
idolatry. In the time of Theodosius, a woman having publicly confessed an
intrigue with a deacon, bishop Necterius, and his successor Chrysostom, granted
communion without confession. It was not until the seventh century that the
abbots of convents exacted from monks and nuns confession twice a year; and it
was at a still later period that bishops of Rome generalized it.
The Mussulmen, who suppose women to have no souls, are shocked at the idea of
confession; and say; How can an honest man think of listening to the recital of
the actions or the secret thoughts of a woman? May we not also ask, on the other
hand, how can an honest woman consent to reveal them?
Thus by mutual reproaches the doctors of the different sects began to reveal all
the crimes of their ministry--all the vices of their craft; and it was found
that among all nations the spirit of the priesthood, their system of conduct,
their actions their morals, were absolutely the same:
That they had everywhere formed secret associations and corporations at enmity
with the rest of society:*
* That we may understand the general feelings of priests respecting the rest
of mankind, whom they always call by the name of the people, let us hear one of
the doctors of the church. "The people," says Bishop Synnesius, in Calvit. page
315, "are desirous of being deceived, we cannot act otherwise respecting them.
The case was similar with the ancient priests of Egypt, and for this reason they
shut themselves up in their temples, and there composed their mysteries, out of
the reach of the eye of the people." And forgetting what he has before just
said, he adds: "for had the people been in the secret they might have been
offended at the deception played upon them. In the mean time how is it possible
to conduct one's self otherwise with the people so long as they are people? For
my own part, to myself I shall always be a philosopher, but in dealing with the
mass of mankind, I shall be a priest."
"A little jargon," says Geogory Nazianzen to St. Jerome (Hieron. ad. Nep.)
"is all that is necessary to impose on the people. The less they comprehend, the
more they admire. Our forefathers and doctors of the church have often said, not
what they thought, but what circumstances and necessity dictated to them."
"We endeavor," says Sanchoniaton, "to excite admiration by means of the
marvellous." (Proep. Evang. lib. 3.)
Such was the conduct of all the priests of antiquity, and is still that of
the Bramins and Lamas who are the exact counterpart of the Egyptian priests.
Such was the practice of the Jesuits, who marched with hasty strides in the same
career. It is useless to point out the whole depravity of such a doctrine. In
general every association which has mystery for its basis, or an oath of
secrecy, is a league of robbers against society, a league divided in its very
bosom into knaves and dupes, or in other words agents and instruments. It is
thus we ought to judge of those modern clubs, which, under the name of
Illuminatists, Martinists, Cagliostronists, and Mesmerites, infest Europe. These
societies are the follies and deceptions of the ancient Cabalists, Magicians,
Orphies, etc., "who," says Plutarch, "led into errors of considerable magnitude,
not only individuals, but kings and nations."
That they had everywhere attributed to themselves prerogatives and immunities,
by means of which they lived exempt from the burdens of other classes:
That they everywhere avoided the toils of the laborer, the dangers of the
soldier, and the disappointments of the merchant:
That they lived everywhere in celibacy, to shun even the cares of a family:
That, under the cloak of poverty, they found everywhere the secret of procuring
wealth and all sorts of enjoyments:
That under the name of mendicity they raised taxes to a greater amount than
princes:
That in the form of gifts and offerings they had established fixed and certain
revenues exempt from charges:
That under pretence of retirement and devotion they lived in idleness and
licentiousness:
That they had made a virtue of alms-giving, to live quietly on the labors of
others:
That they had invented the ceremonies of worship, as a means of attracting the
reverence of the people, while they were playing the parts of gods, of whom they
styled themselves the interpreters and mediators, to assume all their powers;
that, with this design, they had (according to the degree of ignorance or
information of their people) assumed by turns the character of astrologers,
drawers of horoscopes, fortune-tellers, magicians,* necromancers, quacks,
physicians, courtiers, confessors of princes, always aiming at the great object
to govern for their own advantage:
* What is a magician, in the sense in which people understand the word? A man
who by words and gestures pretends to act on supernatural beings, and compel
them to descend at his call and obey his orders. Such was the conduct of the
ancient priests, and such is still that of all priests in idolatrous nations;
for which reason we have given them the denomination of Magicians.
And when a Christian priest pretends to make God descend from heaven, to fix
him to a morsel of leaven, and render, by means of this talisman, souls pure and
in a state of grace, what is this but a trick of magic? And where is the
difference between a Chaman of Tartary who invokes the Genii, or an Indian
Bramin, who makes Vichenou descend in a vessel of water to drive away evil
spirits? Yes, the identity of the spirit of priests in every age and country is
fully established! Every where it is the assumption of an exclusive privilege,
the pretended faculty of moving at will the powers of nature; and this
assumption is so direct a violation of the right of equality, that whenever the
people shall regain their importance, they will forever abolish this
sacrilegious kind of nobility, which has been the type and parent stock of the
other species of nobility.
That sometimes they had exalted the power of kings and consecrated their
persons, to monopolize their favors, or participate their sway:
That sometimes they had preached up the murder of tyrants (reserving it to
themselves to define tyranny), to avenge themselves of their contempt or their
disobedience:
And that they always stigmatised with impiety whatever crossed their interests;
that they hindered all public instruction, to exercise the monopoly of science;
that finally, at all times and in all places, they had found the secret of
living in peace in the midst of the anarchy they created, in safety under the
despotism that they favored, in idleness amidst the industry they preached, and
in abundance while surrounded with scarcity; and all this by carrying on the
singular trade of selling words and gestures to credulous people, who purchase
them as commodities of the greatest value.*
* A curious work would be the comparative history of the agnuses of the pope
and the pastils of the grand Lama. It would be worth while to extend this idea
to religions ceremonies in general, and to confront column by column, the
analogous or contrasting points of faith and superstitious practices in all
nations. There is one more species of superstition which it would be equally
salutary to cure, blind veneration for the great; and for this purpose it would
be alone sufficient to write a minute detail of the private life of kings and
princes. No work could be so philosophical as this; and accordingly we have seen
what a general outcry was excited among kings and the panders of kings, when the
Anecdotes of the Court of Berlin first appeared. What would be the alarm were
the public put in possession of the sequel of this work? Were the people fairly
acquainted with all the absurdities of this species of idol, they would no
longer be exposed to covet their specious pleasures of which the plausible and
hollow appearance disturbs their peace, and hinders them from enjoying the much
more solid happiness of their own condition.
Then the different nations, in a transport of fury, were going to tear in pieces
the men who had thus abused them; but the legislator, arresting this movement of
violence, addressed the chiefs and doctors:
"What!" said he, "instructors of nations, is it thus that you have deceived
them?"
And the terrified priests replied.
"O legislator! we are men. The people are so superstitious! they have themselves
encouraged these errors."*
* Consider in this view the Brabanters.
And the kings said:
"O legislator! the people are so servile and so ignorant! they prostrated
themselves before the yoke, which we scarcely dared to show them."*
* The inhabitants of Vienna, for example, who harnessed themselves like cattle and drew the chariot of Leopold.
Then the legislator, turning to the people--"People!" said he, "remember what
you have just heard; they are two indelible truths. Yes, you yourselves cause
the evils of which you complain; yourselves encourage the tyrants, by a base
adulation of their power, by an imprudent admiration of their false beneficence,
by servility in obedience, by licentiousness in liberty, and by a credulous
reception of every imposition. On whom shall you wreak vengeance for the faults
committed by your own ignorance and cupidity?"
And the people, struck with confusion, remained in mournful silence.
The legislator then resumed his discourse: "O nations!" said he, "we have heard
the discussion of your opinions. The different sentiments which divide you have
given rise to many reflections, and furnished several questions which we shall
propose to you to solve.
"First, considering the diversity and opposition of the creeds to which you are
attached, we ask on what motives you found your persuasion? Is it from a
deliberate choice that you follow the standard of one prophet rather than
another? Before adopting this doctrine, rather than that, did you first compare?
did you carefully examine them? Or have you received them only from the chance
of birth, from the empire of education and habit? Are you not born Christians on
the borders of the Tiber, Mussulmans on those of the Euphrates, Idolaters on the
Indus, just as you are born fair in cold climates, and sable under the scorching
sun of Africa? And if your opinions are the effect of your fortuitous position
on the earth, of consanguinity, of imitation, how is it that such a hazard
should be a ground of conviction, an argument of truth?
"Secondly, when we reflect on the mutual proscriptions and arbitrary intolerance
of your pretensions, we are frightened at the consequences that flow from your
own principles. Nations! who reciprocally devote each other to the bolts of
heavenly wrath, suppose that the universal Being, whom you revere, should this
moment descend from heaven on this multitude; and, clothed with all his power,
should sit on this throne to judge you; suppose that he should say to you:
Mortals! it is your own justice that I am going to exercise upon you. Yes, of
all the religious systems that divide you, one alone shall this day be
preferred; all the others, all this multitude of standards, of nations, of
prophets, shall be condemned to eternal destruction. This is not enough: among
the particular sects of the chosen system, one only can be favored; all the
others must be condemned: neither is this enough;--from this little remnant of a
group I must exclude all those who have not fulfilled the conditions enjoined by
its precepts. O men! to what a small number of elect have you limited your race!
to what a penury of beneficence do you reduce the immensity of my goodness! to
what a solitude of beholders do you condemn my greatness and my glory!
"But," said the legislator rising, no matter you have willed it so. Nations!
here is an urn in which all your names are placed: one only is a prize:
approach, and draw this tremendous lottery!" And the nations, seized with terror
cried: "No, no; we are all brothers, all equal; we cannot condemn each other."
"Then," said the legislator, resuming his seat: "O men! who dispute on so many
subjects, lend an attentive ear to one problem which you exhibit, and which you
ought to decide yourselves."
And the people, giving great attention, he lifted an arm towards heaven, and,
pointing to the sun, said:
"Nations, does that sun, which enlightens you, appear square or triangular?"
"No," answered they with one voice, "it is round."
Then, taking the golden balance that was on the altar:
"This gold," said the legislator, "that you handle every day, is it heavier than
the same volume of copper?"
"Yes,' answered all the people, "gold is heavier than Copper."
Then, taking the sword:
"Is this iron," said the legislator, "softer than lead?"
"No," said the people.
"Is sugar sweet, and gall bitter?"
"Yes."
"Do you love pleasure and hate pain?"
"Yes."
"Thus, then, you are agreed in these points, and many others of the same nature.
"Now, tell us, is there a cavern in the centre of the earth, or inhabitants in
the moon?"
This question caused a universal murmur. Every one answered differently--some
yes, others no; one said it was probable, another said it was an idle and
ridiculous question; some, that it was worth knowing. And the discord was
universal.
After some time the legislator, having obtained silence, said:
"Explain to us, O Nations! this problem: we have put to you several questions
which you have answered with one voice, without distinction of race or of sect:
white men, black men, followers of Mahomet and of Moses, worshippers of Boudha
and of Jesus, all have returned the same answer. We then proposed another
question, and you have all disagreed! Why this unanimity in one case, and this
discordance in the other?"
And the group of simple men and savages answered and said: "The reason of this
is plain. In the first case we see and feel the objects, and we speak from
sensation; in the second, they are beyond the reach of our senses--we speak of
them only from conjecture."
"You have resolved the problem," said the legislator; "and your own consent has
established this first truth:
"That whenever objects can be examined and judged of by your senses, you are
agreed in opinion; and that you only differ when the objects are absent and
beyond your reach.
"From this first truth flows another equally clear and worthy of notice. Since
you agree on things which you know with certainty, it follows that you disagree
only on those which you know not with certainty, and about which you are not
sure; that is to say, you dispute, you quarrel, you fight, for that which is
uncertain, that of which you doubt. O men! is this wisdom?
"Is it not, then, demonstrated that truth is not the object of your contests?
that it is not her cause which you defend, but that of your affections, and your
prejudices? that it is not the object, as it really is in itself, that you would
verify, but the object as you would have it; that is to say, it is not the
evidence of the thing that you would enforce, but your own personal opinion,
your particular manner of seeing and judging? It is a power that you wish to
exercise, an interest that you wish to satisfy, a prerogative that you arrogate
to yourself; it is a contest of vanity. Now, as each of you, on comparing
himself to every other, finds himself his equal and his fellow, he resists by a
feeling of the same right. And your disputes, your combats, your intolerance,
are the effect of this right which you deny each other, and of the intimate
conviction of your equality.
"Now, the only means of establishing harmony is to return to nature, and to take
for a guide and regulator the order of things which she has founded; and then
your accord will prove this other truth:
"That real beings have in themselves an identical, constant and uniform mode of
existence; and that there is in your organs a like mode of being affected by
them.
"But at the same time, by reason of the mobility of these organs as subject to
your will, you may conceive different affections, and find yourselves in
different relations with the same objects; so that you are to them like a
mirror, capable of reflecting them truly as they are, or of distorting and
disfiguring them.
"Hence it follows, that whenever you perceive objects as they are, you agree
among yourselves, and with the objects; and this similitude between your
sensations and their manner of existence, is what constitutes their truth with
respect to you; and, on the contrary, whenever you differ in opinion, your
disagreement is a proof that you do not represent them such as they are,--that
you change them.
"Hence, also, it follows, that the causes of your disagreement exist not in the
objects themselves, but in your minds, in your manner of perceiving or judging.
"To establish, therefore, a uniformity of opinion, it is necessary first to
establish the certainty, completely verified, that the portraits which the mind
forms are perfectly like the originals; that it reflects the objects correctly
as they exist. Now, this result cannot be obtained but in those cases where the
objects can be brought to the test, and submitted to the examination of the
senses. Everything which cannot be brought to this trial is, for that reason
alone, impossible to be determined; there exists no rule, no term of comparison,
no means of certainty, respecting it.
"From this we conclude, that, to live in harmony and peace, we must agree never
to decide on such subjects, and to attach to them no importance; in a word, we
must trace a line of distinction between those that are capable of verification,
and those that are not; and separate by an inviolable barrier the world of
fantastical beings from the world of realities; that is to say, all civil effect
must be taken away from theological and religious opinions.
"This, O ye people of the earth! is the object proposed by a great nation freed
from her fetters and her prejudices; this is the work which, under her eye and
by her orders, we had undertaken, when your kings and your priests came to
interrupt it. O kings and priests! you may suspend, yet for a while, the solemn
publication of the laws of nature; but it is no longer in your power to
annihilate or to subvert them."
A general shout then arose from every part of the assembly; and the nations
universally, and with one voice, testified their assent to the proposals of the
delegates: "Resume," said they, "your holy and sublime labors, and bring them to
perfection. Investigate the laws which nature, for our guidance, has implanted
in our breasts, and collect from them an authentic and immutable code; nor let
this code be any longer for one family only, but for us all without exception.
Be the legislators of the whole human race, as you are the interpreters of
nature herself. Show us the line of partition between the world of chimeras and
that of realities; and teach us, after so many religions of error and delusion,
the religion of evidence and truth!
Then the delegates, having resumed their enquiries into the physical and
constituent attributes of man, and examined the motives and affections which
govern him in his individual and social state, unfolded in these words the laws
on which nature herself has founded his happiness.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()